Literature DB >> 22209723

Riata implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead failure: analysis of explanted leads with a unique insulation defect.

Robert G Hauser1, Deepa McGriff, Linda Kallinen Retel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Riata family of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads (St Jude Medical, Sylmar, CA) appears prone to a unique failure mechanism whereby the conductor cables wear through the silicone insulation from inside-out and are seen outside the lead body (externalized conductors).
OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of Riata lead damage associated with inside-out insulation defects and their clinical consequences.
METHODS: In September 2011, we searched the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturers and User Defined Experience medical device database for reports describing Riata lead failures that had been analyzed by the manufacturer.
RESULTS: The Manufacturers and User Defined Experience search identified 105 leads that had inside-out insulation defects. Eight-French single-coil Riata leads accounted for a higher-than-expected proportion (25.7%) of the leads with this defect. A total of 226 insulation defects were found in the 105 leads (2.2 defects per lead), including 143 inside-out defects (1.4 defects per lead). The most common location of insulation defects was distal to the proximal coil (n = 108). Twenty-eight leads (26.7%) had inside-out insulation defects underneath the shocking coils. Of 43 leads whose cables were assessed for the integrity of the ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene cable coating, 22 (51.2%) were found to be abraded, exposing the conductor surfaces. On X-ray radiography or fluoroscopy, 7 leads were found to have externalized cables; 2 of these leads had no electrical abnormalities, while 4 exhibited noise or increased impedance. Inappropriate shocks were experienced by 31 of the 105 patients (29.5%).
CONCLUSION: Riata leads that have inside-out insulation defects often have multiple defects, including additional inside-out abrasions along the body of the lead and beneath the shocking coils. Eight-French single-coil Riata models may be more prone to externalized cables than are dual-coil and 7-F designs. Externalized cables are but one manifestation of interior insulation damage. Our findings question the durability of the ethylene-tetrafluoroethylene cable coating on exposed cables.
Copyright © 2012 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22209723     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.12.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  18 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for cardiac device lead extraction.

Authors:  Oussama Wazni; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-29       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  [Lead survival and complications (except infections). Are we doing better nowadays?].

Authors:  Martin Seifert; Michael Neuss; Maren Schöpp; Cornel Koban; Christian Butter
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2013-08-06

3.  Cable externalization at the proximal portion of the superior vena cava coil in Riata implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads.

Authors:  Tomonori Katsuki; Hiroshi Furusho; Takashi Kusayama; Shinichiro Takashima; Takeshi Kato; Hisayoshi Murai; Soichiro Usui; Shuichi Kaneko; Masayuki Takamura
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2016-09-28

4.  A case of Durata ICD lead coil externalization: Inside-out lead abrasion?

Authors:  Ian E Mann; Oliver R Segal
Journal:  HeartRhythm Case Rep       Date:  2016-04-25

5.  Active Surveillance of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Registry for Defibrillator Lead Failures.

Authors:  Frederic S Resnic; Arjun Majithia; Sanket S Dhruva; Henry Ssemaganda; Susan Robbins; Danica Marinac-Dabic; Kathleen Hewitt; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Matthew R Reynolds; Michael E Matheny
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-04-14

6.  Increasing lead burden correlates with externalized cables during systematic fluoroscopic screening of Riata leads.

Authors:  Liza P Moorman; J Randall Moorman; John P DiMarco; Rohit Malhotra; Andrew Darby; Kenneth Bilchick; John D Ferguson; J Michael Mangrum; Sandeep Kamath; Pamela K Mason
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.900

7.  Long-term performance of the St Jude Riata 1580-1582 ICD lead family.

Authors:  S D A Valk; D A M J Theuns; L Jordaens
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  [Recommendations of the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the German Society of Cardiology on the approach to patients with Riata® and Riata ST® leads (St. Jude Medical). Nucleus of the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the German Society of Cardiology].

Authors:  C W Israel; D Bänsch; D Böcker; C Butter; J Chun; I Deisenhofer; L Eckardt; J-C Geller; T Hanke; T Klingenheben; C Piorkowski; B Schumacher
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2012-06

9.  Transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead reliability: implications for postmarket surveillance.

Authors:  Daniel B Kramer; Laura A Hatfield; Deepa McGriff; Christopher R Ellis; Melanie T Gura; Michelle Samuel; Linda Kallinen Retel; Robert G Hauser
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 5.501

10.  Failure of a novel silicone-polyurethane copolymer (Optim™) to prevent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead insulation abrasions.

Authors:  Robert G Hauser; Raed H Abdelhadi; Deepa M McGriff; Linda Kallinen Retel
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.