Literature DB >> 23249955

Public attitudes towards genetic testing revisited: comparing opinions between 2002 and 2010.

Lidewij Henneman1, Eric Vermeulen, Carla G van El, Liesbeth Claassen, Danielle R M Timmermans, Martina C Cornel.   

Abstract

Ten years after the Human Genome Project, medicine is still waiting for many of the promised benefits, and experts have tempered their high expectations. Public opinion on genetic testing has generally been favourable but is this still the case? The aim of this study is to compare public experiences, beliefs and expectations concerning genetic testing over the years (2002 vs 2010). A cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted using the Dutch Health Care Consumer Panel in 2002 and 2010. Responses to questions in identical wording were compared. In 2002 and 2010, 817 (63%) and 978 (70%) members responded, respectively. Awareness and reported use of genetic tests remained stable over time. In 2010, more respondents expected genetic testing to become more widely applied, believed that knowledge about the genetic background of disease helps people live longer, and that testing should be promoted more intensively. In 2010, they were also more interested in their own genetic make-up. On the one hand, the concern that a dichotomy would emerge between people with 'good genes' and 'bad genes' was higher. On the other hand, respondents thought that insurance companies would be less likely to demand a genetic test in order to calculate health insurance premiums. In conclusion, the results suggest that in 8 years, expectations of benefits and potential use of genetic testing have been raised among the public, resulting in more positive opinions. Worries on inequity remain, although worries about premium differentiation by insurance companies have decreased.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23249955      PMCID: PMC3722681          DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2012.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet        ISSN: 1018-4813            Impact factor:   4.246


  33 in total

1.  How acceptable are innovative health-care technologies? A survey of public beliefs and attitudes in England and Wales.

Authors:  Michael Calnan; David Montaner; Rob Horne
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2004-11-13       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  The association between knowledge and attitudes about genetic testing for cancer risk in the United States.

Authors:  Abigail Rose; Nikki Peters; Judy A Shea; Katrina Armstrong
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2005-06

Review 3.  Genetic screening.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Beth Tarini; Nancy A Press; James P Evans
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

4.  Perceived genetic knowledge, attitudes towards genetic testing, and the relationship between these among patients with a chronic disease.

Authors:  Mattijn Morren; Mieke Rijken; Arianne N Baanders; Jozien Bensing
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-08-30

5.  Public interest in genetic testing for susceptibility to heart disease and cancer: a population-based survey in the UK.

Authors:  Saskia C Sanderson; Jane Wardle; Martin J Jarvis; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.018

6.  Public experiences, knowledge and expectations about medical genetics and the use of genetic information.

Authors:  Lidewij Henneman; Danielle R M Timmermans; Gerrit van der Wal
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2004

7.  Australian study on public knowledge of human genetics and health.

Authors:  C Molster; T Charles; A Samanek; P O'Leary
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.000

8.  Genetic educational needs and the role of genetics in primary care: a focus group study with multiple perspectives.

Authors:  Elisa Jf Houwink; Scheltus J van Luijk; Lidewij Henneman; Cees van der Vleuten; Geert Jan Dinant; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing: a two year follow-up study in patients with asthma, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Hiske Calsbeek; Mattijn Morren; Jozien Bensing; Mieke Rijken
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 10.  Educating the general public about multifactorial genetic disease: applying a theory-based framework to understand current public knowledge.

Authors:  Chris M R Smerecnik; Ilse Mesters; Nanne K de Vries; Hein de Vries
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  45 in total

1.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Majd Soubani; Lana Abu Salem; Haneen Saker; Muayyad Ahmad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Understanding of multigene test results among males undergoing germline testing for inherited prostate cancer: Implications for genetic counseling.

Authors:  Veda N Giri; Elias Obeid; Sarah E Hegarty; Laura Gross; Lisa Bealin; Colette Hyatt; Carolyn Y Fang; Amy Leader
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-04-14       Impact factor: 4.104

3.  High acceptance of an early dyslexia screening test involving genetic analyses in Germany.

Authors:  Arndt Wilcke; Bent Müller; Gesa Schaadt; Holger Kirsten; Johannes Boltze
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Factors Associated with Interest in Gene-Panel Testing and Risk Communication Preferences in Women from BRCA1/2 Negative Families.

Authors:  Kristina G Flores; Laurie E Steffen; Christopher J McLouth; Belinda E Vicuña; Amanda Gammon; Wendy Kohlmann; Lucretia Vigil; Zoneddy R Dayao; Melanie E Royce; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-08-06       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Parkinson's Disease: Patients' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Interest in Genetic Counseling.

Authors:  Kristin A Maloney; Dina S Alaeddin; Rainer von Coelln; Shannan Dixon; Lisa M Shulman; Katrina Schrader; Yue Guan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Differences in attitudes toward genetic testing among the public, patients, and health-care professionals in Korea.

Authors:  Heesang Eum; Mangyeong Lee; Junghee Yoon; Juhee Cho; Eun Sook Lee; Kui Son Choi; Sangwon Lee; So-Youn Jung; Myong Cheol Lim; Sun-Young Kong; Yoon Jung Chang
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Motivation, Perception, and Treatment Beliefs in the Myocardial Infarction Genes (MI-GENES) Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Sharma Kattel; Tochukwu Onyekwelu; Sherry-Ann Brown; Hayan Jouni; Erin Austin; Iftikhar J Kullo
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Public Views on Genetics and Genetic Testing: A Survey of the General Public in Belgium.

Authors:  Davit Chokoshvili; Carmen Belmans; Roxanne Poncelet; Sofie Sanders; Deborah Vaes; Danya Vears; Sandra Janssens; Isabelle Huys; Pascal Borry
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2017-03

9.  Views of the importance of psychiatric genetic research by potential volunteers from stakeholder groups.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Tenzin Tsungmey; Jane Paik Kim; Melinda Hantke
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 4.791

10.  Genome sequencing in healthcare: understanding the UK general public's views and implications for clinical practice.

Authors:  Lisa M Ballard; Rachel H Horton; Angela Fenwick; Anneke M Lucassen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.246

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.