Literature DB >> 30292779

Views of the importance of psychiatric genetic research by potential volunteers from stakeholder groups.

Laura Weiss Roberts1, Tenzin Tsungmey2, Jane Paik Kim2, Melinda Hantke2.   

Abstract

Few studies have explored potential volunteers' attitudes toward genetic research. To address this gap in the literature, we developed an empirical project to document views held by individuals who may wish to enroll in genetic studies involving mental disorders. People living with mental illness, family members of people with mental illness, and community comparison volunteers were queried regarding their views on the importance of genetic research generally, in comparison with medical research, and in relation to 12 health conditions categorized in four types. T-tests and univariate and multivariate analysis of variance were used as appropriate. Participants expressed support for the importance of genetic research (mean = 9.43, scale = 1-10) and endorsed genetic research more highly compared with non-genetic medical research (mean = 9.43 vs. 8.69, P value = <0.001). The most highly endorsed genetic research was for cognitive disorders, followed by mental illness disorders, physical illness disorders, and addiction disorders (means = 8.88, 8.26, 8.16 and 7.55, respectively, P value = <0.001). Overall, this study provides evidence of strong endorsement of genetic research over non-genetic research by potential volunteers.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community groups; Disorder types; Gender; Genetic research; Non-genetic research; Race/ethnicity

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30292779      PMCID: PMC6333463          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  31 in total

1.  Receptiveness to participation in genetic research: A pilot study comparing views of people with depression, diabetes, or no illness.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Jane Paik Kim
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 2.  Psychiatric genetics: progress amid controversy.

Authors:  Margit Burmeister; Melvin G McInnis; Sebastian Zöllner
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Barriers to improvement of mental health services in low-income and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Benedetto Saraceno; Mark van Ommeren; Rajaie Batniji; Alex Cohen; Oye Gureje; John Mahoney; Devi Sridhar; Chris Underhill
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2007-09-29       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Use of genetic tests among neurologists and psychiatrists: knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, and needs for training.

Authors:  Melissa Salm; Kristopher Abbate; Paul Appelbaum; Ruth Ottman; Wendy Chung; Karen Marder; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Roy Alcalay; Jill Goldman; Alexander Malik Curtis; Christopher Leech; Katherine Johansen Taber; Robert Klitzman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Racial and ethnic differences in willingness to participate in psychiatric genetic research.

Authors:  Eleanor J Murphy; Priya Wickramaratne; Myrna M Weissman
Journal:  Psychiatr Genet       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 2.458

6.  Psychiatrists' views of the genetic bases of mental disorders and behavioral traits and their use of genetic tests.

Authors:  Robert Klitzman; Kristopher J Abbate; Wendy K Chung; Karen Marder; Ruth Ottman; Katherine Johansen Taber; Cheng-Shiun Leu; Paul S Appelbaum
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.254

7.  Psychiatric genetic testing: attitudes and intentions among future users and providers.

Authors:  Mett Marri Laegsgaard; Ole Mors
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 3.568

8.  Potential consumers' attitudes toward psychiatric genetic research and testing and factors influencing their intentions to test.

Authors:  Mett Marri Laegsgaard; Ann Suhl Kristensen; Ole Mors
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2009-02

9.  Preventing Childhood Anxiety Disorders: Is an Applied Game as Effective as a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-Based Program?

Authors:  Elke A Schoneveld; Anna Lichtwarck-Aschoff; Isabela Granic
Journal:  Prev Sci       Date:  2018-02

10.  The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research.

Authors:  Jada Bussey-Jones; Joanne Garrett; Gail Henderson; Mairead Moloney; Connie Blumenthal; Giselle Corbie-Smith
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  3 in total

1.  Perspectives of psychiatric investigators and IRB chairs regarding benefits of psychiatric genetics research.

Authors:  Laura Weiss Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Jane Paik Kim; Maryam Rostami
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 4.791

2.  Perceived protectiveness of research safeguards and influences on willingness to participate in research: A novel MTurk pilot study.

Authors:  Jane Paik Kim; Katie Ryan; Tenzin Tsungmey; Max Kasun; Willa A Roberts; Laura B Dunn; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 5.250

3.  Attitudes toward the right to autonomous decision-making in psychiatric genetic testing: Controversial and context-dependent.

Authors:  Jana Strohmaier; Stephanie H Witt; Josef Frank; Noemi Lemme; Laura Flatau; Fabian Streit; Jerome C Foo; Markus Reitt; Dan Rujescu; Thomas G Schulze; Dirk Lanzerath; Franciska Illes; Franziska Degenhardt; Marcella Rietschel
Journal:  Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.568

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.