Literature DB >> 26704925

Paying attention to working memory: Similarities in the spatial distribution of attention in mental and physical space.

Muhammet Ikbal Sahan1, Tom Verguts2, Carsten Nicolas Boehler2, Gilles Pourtois2, Wim Fias2.   

Abstract

Selective attention is not limited to information that is physically present in the external world, but can also operate on mental representations in the internal world. However, it is not known whether the mechanisms of attentional selection operate in similar fashions in physical and mental space. We studied the spatial distributions of attention for items in physical and mental space by comparing how successfully distractors were rejected at varying distances from the attended location. The results indicated very similar distribution characteristics of spatial attention in physical and mental space. Specifically, we found that performance monotonically improved with increasing distractor distance relative to the attended location, suggesting that distractor confusability is particularly pronounced for nearby distractors, relative to distractors farther away. The present findings suggest that mental representations preserve their spatial configuration in working memory, and that similar mechanistic principles underlie selective attention in physical and in mental space.

Keywords:  Distractor confusion; Distribution; Mental representations; Orienting; Spatial attention; Working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26704925     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0990-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory.

Authors:  E Awh; J Jonides
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  Working memory for location and time: activity in prefrontal area 46 relates to selection rather than maintenance in memory.

Authors:  J B Rowe; R E Passingham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Orienting attention to locations in internal representations.

Authors:  Ivan C Griffin; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Feature-based attention elicits surround suppression in feature space.

Authors:  Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.

Authors:  Adam Gazzaley; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Orienting of attention.

Authors:  M I Posner
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

Review 7.  Working memory as internal attention: toward an integrative account of internal and external selection processes.

Authors:  Anastasia Kiyonaga; Tobias Egner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-04

8.  The temporal contiguity effect predicts episodic memory performance.

Authors:  Per B Sederberg; Jonathan F Miller; Marc W Howard; Michael J Kahana
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-09

9.  Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision.

Authors:  Paul M Bays; Masud Husain
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Rapid forgetting prevented by retrospective attention cues.

Authors:  Yoni Pertzov; Paul M Bays; Sabine Joseph; Masud Husain
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  7 in total

1.  The precision of spatial selection into the focus of attention in working memory.

Authors:  Alessandra S Souza; Mirko Thalmann; Klaus Oberauer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  The Neural Consequences of Attentional Prioritization of Internal Representations in Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Muhammet I Sahan; Andrew D Sheldon; Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Mnemonic attention in analogy to perceptual attention: harmony but not uniformity.

Authors:  Sizhu Han; Yixuan Ku
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-07-09

4.  Adverse orienting effects on visual working memory encoding and maintenance.

Authors:  Benchi Wang; Chuyao Yan; Zhiguo Wang; Christian N L Olivers; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

5.  The Graded Fate of Unattended Stimulus Representations in Visuospatial Working Memory.

Authors:  Muhammet I Sahan; Edwin S Dalmaijer; Tom Verguts; Masud Husain; Wim Fias
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-02-26

6.  Training modulates memory-driven capture.

Authors:  Edyta Sasin; Florian Sense; Mark Nieuwenstein; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 2.157

7.  Object-based selection in visual working memory.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Lin; Garry Kong; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.