Literature DB >> 12669744

A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Michael Tombu1, Pierre Jolicoeur.   

Abstract

The authors present the central capacity sharing (CCS) model and derive equations describing its behaviors to explain results from dual-task situations. The predictions of the CCS model are contrasted with those of the central bottleneck model. The CCS model predicts all of the hallmark effects of the psychological refractory period (PRP) pardigm: -1 slope of the PRP effect at short stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs), underadditivity of precentral Task 2 manipulations, additivity of central or postcentral Task 2 manipulations with SOA, and carry forward to Task 2 of Task 1 precentral or central manipulations at short SOAs. The CCS model also predicts that Task 1 response times increase with decreasing SOA. The model is a viable alternative to the central bottleneck model.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12669744     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.29.1.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  179 in total

1.  Does dorsal processing require central capacity? More evidence from the PRP paradigm.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Response selection in dual task paradigms: observations from random generation tasks.

Authors:  Georg Dirnberger; Marjan Jahanshahi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Crossmodal action selection: evidence from dual-task compatibility.

Authors:  Lynn Huestegge; Iring Koch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

4.  Age-related emotional bias in processing two emotionally valenced tasks.

Authors:  Philip A Allen; Mei-Ching Lien; Elliott Jardin
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-10-20

5.  A cross-sectional analysis on the effects of age on dual tasking in typically developing children.

Authors:  Shikha Saxena; Annette Majnemer; Karen Li; Miriam Beauchamp; Isabelle Gagnon
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-12-01

6.  Emergent perceptual features in the benefit of consistent stimulus-response mappings on dual-task performance.

Authors:  Kim-Phuong L Vu; Robert W Proctor
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-10-08

7.  Central processing overlap modulates P3 latency.

Authors:  R Dell'acqua; P Jolicoeur; F Vespignani; P Toffanin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?

Authors:  Eric Ruthruff; Eliot Hazeltine; Roger W Remington
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

9.  On the control of visual spatial attention: evidence from human electrophysiology.

Authors:  Pierre Jolicoeur; Paola Sessa; Roberto Dell'Acqua; Nicolas Robitaille
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2005-09-24

Review 10.  Where attention falls: Increased risk of falls from the converging impact of cortical cholinergic and midbrain dopamine loss on striatal function.

Authors:  Martin Sarter; Roger L Albin; Aaron Kucinski; Cindy Lustig
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 5.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.