Literature DB >> 20939025

In vivo discrimination of hip fracture with quantitative computed tomography: results from the prospective European Femur Fracture Study (EFFECT).

Valérie Danielle Bousson1, Judith Adams, Klaus Engelke, Mounir Aout, Martine Cohen-Solal, Catherine Bergot, Didier Haguenauer, Daniele Goldberg, Karine Champion, Redha Aksouh, Eric Vicaut, Jean-Denis Laredo.   

Abstract

In assessing osteoporotic fractures of the proximal femur, the main objective of this in vivo case-control study was to evaluate the performance of quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and a dedicated 3D image analysis tool [Medical Image Analysis Framework--Femur option (MIAF-Femur)] in differentiating hip fracture and non-hip fracture subjects. One-hundred and seven women were recruited in the study, 47 women (mean age 81.6 years) with low-energy hip fractures and 60 female non-hip fracture control subjects (mean age 73.4 years). Bone mineral density (BMD) and geometric variables of cortical and trabecular bone in the femoral head and neck, trochanteric, and intertrochanteric regions and proximal shaft were assessed using QCT and MIAF-Femur. Areal BMD (aBMD) was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in 96 (37 hip fracture and 59 non-hip fracture subjects) of the 107 patients. Logistic regressions were computed to extract the best discriminates of hip fracture, and area under the receiver characteristic operating curve (AUC) was calculated. Three logistic models that discriminated the occurrence of hip fracture with QCT variables were obtained (AUC = 0.84). All three models combined one densitometric variable--a trabecular BMD (measured in the femoral head or in the trochanteric region)--and one geometric variable--a cortical thickness value (measured in the femoral neck or proximal shaft). The best discriminant using DXA variables was obtained with total femur aBMD (AUC = 0.80, p = .003). Results highlight a synergistic contribution of trabecular and cortical components in hip fracture risk and the utility of assessing QCT BMD of the femoral head for improved understanding and possible insights into prevention of hip fractures.
Copyright © 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20939025     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  32 in total

1.  Sex-related variations in cortical and trabecular bone of the femoral neck in an elderly Chinese population.

Authors:  L Wang; X G Cheng; Y B Su; K Brown; L Xu; K Li; C X Zhang; Y Zhang; Y Y Duanmu; X B Wu; M Y Wang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Spatial Differences in the Distribution of Bone Between Femoral Neck and Trochanteric Fractures.

Authors:  Aihong Yu; Julio Carballido-Gamio; Ling Wang; Thomas F Lang; Yongbin Su; Xinbao Wu; Manyi Wang; Jie Wei; Chen Yi; Xiaoguang Cheng
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 3.  Advanced CT based in vivo methods for the assessment of bone density, structure, and strength.

Authors:  K Engelke; C Libanati; T Fuerst; P Zysset; H K Genant
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.096

4.  Assessment of femoral neck bone metabolism using 18F-sodium fluoride PET/CT imaging.

Authors:  Sylvia Rhodes; Alexandra Batzdorf; Olivia Sorci; Matthew Peng; Amanda Jankelovits; Julia Hornyak; Jongyun An; Peter B Noël; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen; Abass Alavi; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 5.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

6.  Effects of osteoporosis drug treatments on cortical and trabecular bone in the femur using DXA-based 3D modeling.

Authors:  R Winzenrieth; L Humbert; S Di Gregorio; E Bonel; M García; L Del Rio
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Predictive ability of novel volumetric and geometric indices derived from dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric images of the proximal femur for hip fracture compared with conventional areal bone mineral density: the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study.

Authors:  M Iki; R Winzenrieth; J Tamaki; Y Sato; N Dongmei; E Kajita; K Kouda; A Yura; T Tachiki; K Kamiya; S Kagamimori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Three-dimensional structural analysis of the proximal femur in an age-stratified sample of women.

Authors:  Kristy M Nicks; Shreyasee Amin; L Joseph Melton; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Louise K McCready; B Lawrence Riggs; Klaus Engelke; Sundeep Khosla
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Proximal femoral density distribution and structure in relation to age and hip fracture risk in women.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Roy Harnish; Isra Saeed; Timothy Streeper; Sigurdur Sigurdsson; Shreyasee Amin; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Terry M Therneau; Kristin Siggeirsdottir; Xiaoguang Cheng; L Joseph Melton; Joyce Keyak; Vilmundur Gudnason; Sundeep Khosla; Tamara B Harris; Thomas F Lang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.741

10.  QCT of the proximal femur--which parameters should be measured to discriminate hip fracture?

Authors:  O Museyko; V Bousson; J Adams; J -D Laredo; K Engelke
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.