Literature DB >> 21810530

Official Positions for FRAX® Bone Mineral Density and FRAX® simplification from Joint Official Positions Development Conference of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry and International Osteoporosis Foundation on FRAX®.

E Michael Lewiecki1, Juliet E Compston, Paul D Miller, Jonathan D Adachi, Judith E Adams, William D Leslie, John A Kanis, Alireza Moayyeri, Robert A Adler, Didier B Hans, David L Kendler, Adolfo Diez-Perez, Marc-Antoine Krieg, Basel K Masri, Roman R Lorenc, Douglas C Bauer, Glen M Blake, Robert G Josse, Patricia Clark, Aliya A Khan.   

Abstract

Tools to predict fracture risk are useful for selecting patients for pharmacological therapy in order to reduce fracture risk and redirect limited healthcare resources to those who are most likely to benefit. FRAX® is a World Health Organization fracture risk assessment algorithm for estimating the 10-year probability of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fracture. Effective application of FRAX® in clinical practice requires a thorough understanding of its limitations as well as its utility. For some patients, FRAX® may underestimate or overestimate fracture risk. In order to address some of the common issues encountered with the use of FRAX® for individual patients, the International Society for Clinical Densitometry (ISCD) and International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) assigned task forces to review the medical evidence and make recommendations for optimal use of FRAX® in clinical practice. Among the issues addressed were the use of bone mineral density (BMD) measurements at skeletal sites other than the femoral neck, the use of technologies other than dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, the use of FRAX® without BMD input, the use of FRAX® to monitor treatment, and the addition of the rate of bone loss as a clinical risk factor for FRAX®. The evidence and recommendations were presented to a panel of experts at the Joint ISCD-IOF FRAX® Position Development Conference, resulting in the development of Joint ISCD-IOF Official Positions addressing FRAX®-related issues.
Copyright © 2011 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21810530     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2011.05.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Densitom        ISSN: 1094-6950            Impact factor:   2.617


  12 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of fracture risk.

Authors:  Sanford Baim; William D Leslie
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Time to Clinically Relevant Fracture Risk Scores in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Margaret L Gourlay; Robert A Overman; Jason P Fine; Carolyn J Crandall; John Robbins; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud; Erin S LeBlanc; Margery L Gass; Karen C Johnson; Catherine R Womack; Andrea Z LaCroix
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.965

Review 3.  Advances in bone imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Judith E Adams
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 4.  Osteoporosis in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Patients - An Emerging Clinical Concern.

Authors:  Filippo Maffezzoni; Teresa Porcelli; Ioannis Karamouzis; Eugenia Quiros-Roldan; Francesco Castelli; Gherardo Mazziotti; Andrea Giustina
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-28

Review 5.  A systematic review of intervention thresholds based on FRAX : A report prepared for the National Osteoporosis Guideline Group and the International Osteoporosis Foundation.

Authors:  John A Kanis; Nicholas C Harvey; Cyrus Cooper; Helena Johansson; Anders Odén; Eugene V McCloskey
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 2.617

6.  Potential Extensions of the US FRAX Algorithm.

Authors:  L Joseph Melton; Elizabeth J Atkinson; Sara J Achenbach; John A Kanis; Terry M Therneau; Helena Johansson; Sundeep Khosla; Shreyasee Amin
Journal:  J Osteoporos       Date:  2012-08-15

Review 7.  Challenges in implementing and maintaining osteoporosis therapy.

Authors:  Ankita Modi; Shiva Sajjan; Sampada Gandhi
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-08-13

8.  Evaluation of the validity of treatment decisions based on surrogate country models before introduction of the Polish FRAX and recommendations in comparison to current practice.

Authors:  Wojciech M Glinkowski; Jerzy Narloch; Bożena Glinkowska; Małgorzata Bandura
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Study of DXA-derived lateral-medial cortical bone thickness in assessing hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Yujia Long; William D Leslie; Yunhua Luo
Journal:  Bone Rep       Date:  2015-04-08

10.  Association between low-frequency ultrasound and hip fractures -- comparison with DXA-based BMD.

Authors:  Mikko Määttä; Petro Moilanen; Jussi Timonen; Pasi Pulkkinen; Raija Korpelainen; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.