Literature DB >> 15159268

Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures.

Ethel S Siris1, Ya-Ting Chen, Thomas A Abbott, Elizabeth Barrett-Connor, Paul D Miller, Lois E Wehren, Marc L Berger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment intervention thresholds for prevention of osteoporotic fractures can be derived from reports from the World Health Organization (diagnostic criteria) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (treatment criteria). It is not known how well these thresholds work to identify women who will fracture and are therefore candidates for treatment interventions. We used data from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) to examine the effect of different treatment thresholds on fracture incidence and numbers of women with fractures within the year following bone mineral density measurement.
METHODS: The study comprised 149 524 white postmenopausal women aged 50 to 104 years (mean age, 64.5 years). At baseline, bone mineral density was assessed by peripheral bone densitometry at the heel, finger, or forearm. New fractures during the next 12 months were self-reported.
RESULTS: New fractures were reported by 2259 women, including 393 hip fractures; only 6.4% had baseline T scores of -2.5 or less (World Health Organization definition for osteoporosis). Although fracture rates were highest in these women, they experienced only 18% of the osteoporotic fractures and 26% of the hip fractures. By National Osteoporosis Foundation treatment guidelines, 22.6% of the women had T scores of 2.0 or less, or -1.5 or less with 1 or more clinical risk factors. Fracture rates were lower, but 45% of osteoporotic fractures and 53% of hip fractures occurred in these women.
CONCLUSIONS: Using peripheral measurement devices, 82% of postmenopausal women with fractures had T scores better than -2.5. A strategy to reduce overall fracture incidence will likely require lifestyle changes and a targeted effort to identify and develop treatment protocols for women with less severe low bone mass who are nonetheless at increased risk for future fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15159268     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.164.10.1108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  280 in total

1.  Evaluation of trabecular microarchitecture in nonosteoporotic postmenopausal women with and without fracture.

Authors:  Richard Kijowski; Michael Tuite; Diane Kruger; Alejandro Munoz Del Rio; Michael Kleerekoper; Neil Binkley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Structural and mechanical parameters of trabecular bone estimated from in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance images at 3 tesla field strength.

Authors:  Michael Jeffrey Wald; Jeremy Franklin Magland; Chamith Sudesh Rajapakse; Felix Werner Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 3.  Microarchitecture in focus.

Authors:  R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  A critical review of racial/ethnic variables in osteoporosis and bone density research.

Authors:  M S Megyesi; L M Hunt; H Brody
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Variations in morphological and biomechanical indices at the distal radius in subjects with identical BMD.

Authors:  Galateia J Kazakia; Andrew J Burghardt; Thomas M Link; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  The real enemy is fragility fracture, not osteoporosis.

Authors:  C E Uzoigwe
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Bone mineral density measurement in puerperal women as a predictor of persistent osteopenia.

Authors:  Takumi Kurabayashi; Hiroshi Nagata; Nozomi Takeyama; Hiroshi Matsushita; Kenichi Tanaka
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 2.626

8.  FRAX calculated without BMD does not correctly identify Caucasian men with densitometric evidence of osteoporosis.

Authors:  R C Hamdy; E Seier; K Whalen; W A Clark; K Hicks; T B Piggee
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Vertebral body morphology is associated with incident lumbar vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women. The OFELY study.

Authors:  J P Roux; S Belghali; J Wegrzyn; E S Rendu; R Chapurlat
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Hormone therapy for the prevention of bone loss in menopausal women with osteopenia: is it a viable option?

Authors:  Mary H Hohenhaus; Kelly A McGarry; Nananda F Col
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.