Literature DB >> 3655121

Frequency discrimination of complex signals, frequency selectivity, and speech perception in hearing-impaired subjects.

J W Horst1.   

Abstract

Frequency discrimination of spectral envelopes of complex stimuli, frequency selectivity measured with psychophysical tuning curves, and speech perception were determined in hearing-impaired subjects each having a relatively flat, sensory-neural loss. Both the frequency discrimination and speech perception measures were obtained in quiet and noise. Most of these subjects showed abnormal susceptibility to ambient noise with regard to speech perception. Frequency discrimination in quiet and frequency selectivity did not correlate significantly. At low signal-to-noise ratios, frequency discrimination correlated significantly with frequency selectivity. Speech perception in noise correlated significantly with frequency selectivity and with frequency discrimination at low signal-to-noise ratios. The frequency discrimination data are discussed in terms of an excitation-pattern model. However, they neither support nor refute the model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3655121     DOI: 10.1121/1.395286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  8 in total

1.  Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

2.  Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Anderson; Andrew J Oxenham; Peggy B Nelson; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectro-temporal cues enhance modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Yi Zheng; Monty Escabí; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Distorted Tonotopy Severely Degrades Neural Representations of Connected Speech in Noise following Acoustic Trauma.

Authors:  Satyabrata Parida; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Effects of digital noise reduction on speech perception for children with hearing loss.

Authors:  Patricia Stelmachowicz; Dawna Lewis; Brenda Hoover; Kanae Nishi; Ryan McCreery; William Woods
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  The organization and physiology of the auditory thalamus and its role in processing acoustic features important for speech perception.

Authors:  Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.381

7.  Real-time contrast enhancement to improve speech recognition.

Authors:  Joshua M Alexander; Rick L Jenison; Keith R Kluender
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials in Response to Frequency Changes with Varied Magnitude, Rate, and Direction.

Authors:  Bernard M D Vonck; Marc J W Lammers; Marjolijn van der Waals; Gijsbert A van Zanten; Huib Versnel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2019-06-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.