Literature DB >> 24456178

Clinical assessment of spectral modulation detection for adult cochlear implant recipients: a non-language based measure of performance outcomes.

René H Gifford1, Andrea Hedley-Williams, Anthony J Spahr.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Spectral modulation detection (SMD) provides a psychoacoustic estimate of spectral resolution. The SMD threshold for an implanted ear is highly correlated with speech understanding and is thus a non-linguistic, psychoacoustic index of speech understanding. This measure, however, is time and equipment intensive and thus not practical for clinical use. Thus the purpose of the current study was to investigate the efficacy of a quick SMD task with the following three study aims: (1) to investigate the correlation between the long psychoacoustic, and quick SMD tasks, (2) to determine the test/retest variability of the quick SMD task, and (3) to evaluate the relationship between the quick SMD task and speech understanding.
DESIGN: This study included a within-subjects, repeated-measures design. STUDY SAMPLE: Seventy-six adult cochlear implant recipients participated.
RESULTS: The results were as follows: (1) there was a significant correlation between the long psychoacoustic, and quick SMD tasks, (2) the test-retest variability of the quick SMD task was highly significant and, (3) there was a significant positive correlation between the quick SMD task and monosyllabic word recognition.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study represent the direct clinical translation of a research-proven task of SMD into a quick, clinically feasible format.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24456178      PMCID: PMC4067975          DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2013.851800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  19 in total

1.  The resolution of complex spectral patterns by cochlear implant and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners.

Authors:  Y Takata; A K Nábĕlek
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Belinda A Henry; Christopher W Turner; Amy Behrens
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Anthony J Spahr; Aniket A Saoji; Gene Y Fridman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Jong Ho Won; Ward R Drennan; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-06-21

6.  Year 2007 position statement: Principles and guidelines for early hearing detection and intervention programs.

Authors: 
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Revised CNC lists for auditory tests.

Authors:  G E PETERSON; I LEHISTE
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1962-02

8.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  L H Mayo; M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Perception of consonants in reverberation by native and non-native listeners.

Authors:  A K Nábĕlek; A M Donahue
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Relationship between auditory function of nonimplanted ears and bimodal benefit.

Authors:  Ting Zhang; Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Aniket Saoji
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

View more
  37 in total

1.  Automatic localization of closely spaced cochlear implant electrode arrays in clinical CTs.

Authors:  Yiyuan Zhao; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie; Jack H Noble
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The Effects of Acoustic Bandwidth on Simulated Bimodal Benefit in Children and Adults with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Sterling W Sheffield; Michelle Simha; Kelly N Jahn; René H Gifford
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Speech recognition as a function of the number of channels in perimodiolar electrode recipients.

Authors:  Katelyn A Berg; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Robert T Dwyer; Robert F Labadie; René H Gifford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory performance of post-lingually deafened adult cochlear implant recipients using electrode deactivation based on postoperative cone beam CT images.

Authors:  Fabiana Danieli; Thomas Dermacy; Maria Stella Arantes do Amaral; Ana Cláudia Mirandola Barbosa Reis; Dan Gnansia; Miguel Angelo Hyppolito
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 5.  The Physiologic and Psychophysical Consequences of Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Eric Hoover
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

6.  Initial Results With Image-guided Cochlear Implant Programming in Children.

Authors:  Jack H Noble; Andrea J Hedley-Williams; Linsey Sunderhaus; Benoit M Dawant; Robert F Labadie; Stephen M Camarata; René H Gifford
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Speech perception of sine-wave signals by children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Jamie Kuess; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Forward masking patterns by low and high-rate stimulation in cochlear implant users: Differences in masking effectiveness and spread of neural excitation.

Authors:  Ning Zhou; Lixue Dong; Susannah Dixon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Nonlinguistic Outcome Measures in Adult Cochlear Implant Users Over the First Year of Implantation.

Authors:  Ward R Drennan; Jong Ho Won; Alden O Timme; Jay T Rubinstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.