Literature DB >> 12597191

Perception of the low pitch of frequency-shifted complexes.

Geoffrey A Moore1, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

When all of the components in a harmonic complex tone are shifted in frequency by delta f, the pitch of the complex shifts roughly in proportion to delta f. For tones with a small number of components, the shift is usually somewhat larger than predicted from pitch theories, which has been attributed to the influence of combination tones [Smoorenburg, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 48, 924-941 (1970)]. Experiment 1 assessed whether combination tones influence the pitch of complex tones with more than five harmonics, by using noise to mask the combination tones. The matching stimulus was a harmonic complex. Test complexes were bandpass filtered with passbands centered on harmonic numbers 5 (resolved), 11 (intermediate), or 16 (unresolved) and fundamental frequencies (FOs) were 100, 200, or 400 Hz. For the intermediate and unresolved conditions, the matching stimuli were filtered with the same passband to minimize differences in the excitation patterns of the test and matching stimuli. For the resolved condition, the matching stimulus had a passband centered above that of the test stimulus, to avoid common partials. For resolved and intermediate conditions, pitch shifts were observed that could generally be predicted from the frequencies of the partials. The shifts were unaffected by addition of noise to mask combination tones. For the unresolved condition, no pitch shift was observed, which suggests that pitch is not based on temporal fine structure for stimuli containing only high unresolved harmonics. Experiment 2 used three-component complexes resembling those of Schouten [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 34, 1418-1424 (1962)]. Nominal harmonic numbers were 3, 4, 5 (resolved), 8, 9, 10 (intermediate), or 13, 14, 15 (unresolved) and F0s were 50, 100, 200, or 400 Hz. Clear shifts in the matches were found for all conditions, including unresolved. For the latter, subjects may have matched the "center of gravity" of the excitation patterns of the test and matching stimuli.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12597191     DOI: 10.1121/1.1536631

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  17 in total

1.  Infant pitch perception: Missing fundamental melody discrimination.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Kaylah Lalonde; Monika-Maria Oster; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Can temporal fine structure represent the fundamental frequency of unresolved harmonics?

Authors:  Andrew J Oxenham; Christophe Micheyl; Michael V Keebler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Further evidence that fundamental-frequency difference limens measure pitch discrimination.

Authors:  Christophe Micheyl; Claire M Ryan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  The singular nature of auditory and visual scene analysis in autism.

Authors:  I-Fan Lin; Aya Shirama; Nobumasa Kato; Makio Kashino
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Perceptual weighting of the envelope and fine structure across frequency bands for sentence intelligibility: effect of interruption at the syllabic-rate and periodic-rate of speech.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  On the possibility of a place code for the low pitch of high-frequency complex tones.

Authors:  Sébastien Santurette; Torsten Dau; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perception of missing fundamental pitch by 3- and 4-month-old human infants.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perception of the pitch of unresolved harmonics by 3- and 7-month-old human infants.

Authors:  Bonnie K Lau; Lynne A Werner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Dual-pitch processing mechanisms in primate auditory cortex.

Authors:  Daniel Bendor; Michael S Osmanski; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The frequency following response (FFR) may reflect pitch-bearing information but is not a direct representation of pitch.

Authors:  Hedwig E Gockel; Robert P Carlyon; Anahita Mehta; Christopher J Plack
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.