Literature DB >> 23230345

Silicon as an Unconventional Detector in Positron Emission Tomography.

N H Clinthorne1, K Brzezinski, E Chesi, E Cochran, M Grkovski, B Grošičar, K Honscheid, S Huh, H Kagan, C Lacasta, V Linhart, M Mikuž, S Smith, V Stankova, A Studen, P Weilhammer, D Zontar.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a widely used technique in medical imaging and in studying small animal models of human disease. In the conventional approach, the 511 keV annihilation photons emitted from a patient or small animal are detected by a ring of scintillators such as LYSO read out by arrays of photodetectors. Although this has been a successful in achieving ~5mm FWHM spatial resolution in human studies and ~1mm resolution in dedicated small animal instruments, there is interest in significantly improving these figures. Silicon, although its stopping power is modest for 511 keV photons, offers a number of potential advantages over more conventional approaches. Foremost is its high spatial resolution in 3D: our past studies show that there is little diffculty in localizing 511 keV photon interactions to ~0.3mm. Since spatial resolution and reconstructed image noise trade off in a highly non-linear manner that depends on the PET instrument response, if high spatial resolution is the goal, silicon may outperform standard PET detectors even though it has lower sensitivity to 511 keV photons. To evaluate silicon in a variety of PET "magnifying glass" configurations, an instrument has been constructed that consists of an outer partial-ring of PET scintillation detectors into which various arrangements of silicon detectors can be inserted to emulate dual-ring or imaging probe geometries. Recent results have demonstrated 0.7 mm FWHM resolution using pad detectors having 16×32 arrays of 1.4mm square pads and setups have shown promising results in both small animal and PET imaging probe configurations. Although many challenges remain, silicon has potential to become the PET detector of choice when spatial resolution is the primary consideration.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23230345      PMCID: PMC3516620          DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2012.05.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A        ISSN: 0168-9002            Impact factor:   1.455


  3 in total

1.  A prototype of very high resolution small animal PET scanner using silicon pad detectors.

Authors:  Sang-June Park; W Leslie Rogers; Sam Huh; Harris Kagan; Klaus Honscheid; Don Burdette; Enrico Chesi; Carlos Lacasta; Gabriela Llosa; Marko Mikuz; Andrej Studen; Peter Weilhammer; Neal H Clinthorne
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2007-01-21       Impact factor: 1.455

2.  Design of a very high-resolution small animal PET scanner using a silicon scatter detector insert.

Authors:  Sang-June Park; W Leslie Rogers; Neal H Clinthorne
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Timing performance of the silicon PET insert probe.

Authors:  A Studen; D Burdette; E Chesi; V Cindro; N H Clinthorne; E Cochran; B Grosicar; H Kagan; C Lacasta; V Linhart; M Mikuz; V Stankova; P Weilhammer; D Zontar
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 0.972

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  System resolution versus image uncertainty for positron emission tomography scanners.

Authors:  Andrej Studen; Neal Clinthorne
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Silicon detectors for combined MR-PET and MR-SPECT imaging.

Authors:  A Studen; E Chesi; V Cindro; N H Clinthorne; E Cochran; B Grošičar; M Grkovski; K Honscheid; H Kagan; C Lacasta; G Llosa; M Mikuž; V Stankova; P Weilhammer; D Zontar
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 3.  Positron Emission Tomography: Current Challenges and Opportunities for Technological Advances in Clinical and Preclinical Imaging Systems.

Authors:  Juan José Vaquero; Paul Kinahan
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 9.590

4.  Evaluation of a high resolution silicon PET insert module.

Authors:  Milan Grkovski; Karol Brzezinski; Vladimir Cindro; Neal H Clinthorne; Harris Kagan; Carlos Lacasta; Marko Mikuž; Carles Solaz; Andrej Studen; Peter Weilhammer; Dejan Žontar
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 1.455

5.  Experimental evaluation of the resolution improvement provided by a silicon PET probe.

Authors:  K Brzeziński; J F Oliver; J Gillam; M Rafecas; A Studen; M Grkovski; H Kagan; S Smith; G Llosá; C Lacasta; N H Clinthorne
Journal:  J Instrum       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 1.415

6.  Augmented Whole-Body Scanning via Magnifying PET.

Authors:  Jianyong Jiang; Suranjana Samanta; Ke Li; Stefan B Siegel; Robert A Mintzer; Sanghee Cho; Maurizio Conti; Matthias Schmand; Joseph O'Sullivan; Yuan-Chuan Tai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  New prospects for PET in prostate cancer imaging: a physicist's viewpoint.

Authors:  Maurizio Conti
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2014-09-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.