Literature DB >> 18084629

A prototype of very high resolution small animal PET scanner using silicon pad detectors.

Sang-June Park1, W Leslie Rogers, Sam Huh, Harris Kagan, Klaus Honscheid, Don Burdette, Enrico Chesi, Carlos Lacasta, Gabriela Llosa, Marko Mikuz, Andrej Studen, Peter Weilhammer, Neal H Clinthorne.   

Abstract

A very high resolution small animal positron emission tomograph (PET) which can achieve sub-millimeter spatial resolution is being developed using silicon pad detectors. The prototype PET for a single slice instrument consists of two 1 mm thick silicon pad detectors, each containing a 32 x 16 array of 1.4 mm x 1.4 mm pads read out with four VATAGP3 chips which have 128 channels low-noise self triggering ASIC in each chip, coincidence units, a source turntable and tungsten slice collimator. The silicon detectors were located edgewise on opposite sides of a 4 cm field-of-view to maximize efficiency. Energy resolution is dominated by electronic noise, which is 0.98% (1.38 keV) FWHM at 140.5 keV. Coincidence timing resolution is 82.1 ns FWHM and coincidence efficiency was measured to be 1.04 x 10(-3) % from two silicon detectors with annihilation photons of (18)F source Image data were acquired and reconstructed using conventional 2-D filtered-back projection (FBP) and a maximum likelihood expectation maximization (ML-EM) method. Image resolution of approximately 1.45 mm FWHM is obtained from 1-D profile of 1.1 mm diameter (18)F line source image. Even better resolution can be obtained with smaller detector element sizes. While many challenges remain in scaling up the instrument to useful efficiency including densely packed detectors and significantly improved timing resolution, performance of the test setup in terms of easily achieving submillimeter resolution is compelling.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18084629      PMCID: PMC2140047          DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A        ISSN: 0168-9002            Impact factor:   1.455


  4 in total

1.  MicroPET II: design, development and initial performance of an improved microPET scanner for small-animal imaging.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Arion F Chatziioannou; Yongfeng Yang; Robert W Silverman; Ken Meadors; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-06-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  High-resolution PET detector design: modelling components of intrinsic spatial resolution.

Authors:  Jennifer R Stickel; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Performance evaluation of the microPET focus: a third-generation microPET scanner dedicated to animal imaging.

Authors:  Yuan-Chuan Tai; Ananya Ruangma; Douglas Rowland; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Patrick L Chow; Richard Laforest
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.057

4.  Optimization and performance evaluation of the microPET II scanner for in vivo small-animal imaging.

Authors:  Yongfeng Yang; Yuan-Chuan Tai; Stefan Siegel; Danny F Newport; Bing Bai; Quanzheng Li; Richard M Leahy; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Timing performance of the silicon PET insert probe.

Authors:  A Studen; D Burdette; E Chesi; V Cindro; N H Clinthorne; E Cochran; B Grosicar; H Kagan; C Lacasta; V Linhart; M Mikuz; V Stankova; P Weilhammer; D Zontar
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 0.972

2.  Silicon as an Unconventional Detector in Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  N H Clinthorne; K Brzezinski; E Chesi; E Cochran; M Grkovski; B Grošičar; K Honscheid; S Huh; H Kagan; C Lacasta; V Linhart; M Mikuž; S Smith; V Stankova; A Studen; P Weilhammer; D Zontar
Journal:  Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 1.455

Review 3.  Recent developments in PET detector technology.

Authors:  Tom K Lewellen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  A review of imaging techniques for systems biology.

Authors:  Armen R Kherlopian; Ting Song; Qi Duan; Mathew A Neimark; Ming J Po; John K Gohagan; Andrew F Laine
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2008-08-12
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.