Literature DB >> 15125120

A comparison of polyethylene wear rates between cemented and cementless cups. A prospective, randomised trial.

P McCombe1, S A Williams.   

Abstract

We selected randomly a consecutive series of 162 patients requiring hip replacement to receive either a cementless, hemispherical, modular, titanium acetabular cup or a cemented, all-polyethylene cup. These replacements were performed by two surgeons in four general hospitals. The same surgical technique was used and a 26 mm metal-head femoral component was used in every case. After exclusions, 115 hips were studied for differences in rates of wear and osteolysis. The mean clinical follow-up was eight years and the mean radiological follow-up, 6.5 years. The cementless cups wore at a mean rate of 0.15 mm per year and the cemented cups at 0.07 mm per year. This difference was significant (p < 0.0001). Our findings in this mid-term study suggest that cementless cups wear more than cemented cups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15125120     DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b3.14567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br        ISSN: 0301-620X


  9 in total

Review 1.  Is there evidence for a superior method of socket fixation in hip arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Authors:  Dean Pakvis; Gijs van Hellemondt; Enrico de Visser; Wilco Jacobs; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Is there evidence for accelerated polyethylene wear in uncemented compared to cemented acetabular components? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hugo C van der Veen; Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Rudolf W Poolman; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Accelerated polyethylene wear and early failure of the uncemented Reflection acetabular component: a ten to fifteen-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Nicholas D Clement; Martin Mitchell; Morag E Trayner; Daniel E Porter; Graham M Lawson; Richard Burnett
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-22       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Direct comparison of polyethylene wear in cemented and uncemented acetabular cups.

Authors:  Håvard Bjerkholt; Oystein Høvik; Olav Reikerås
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-09-02

Review 5.  Early subsidence of shape-closed hip arthroplasty stems is associated with late revision. A systematic review and meta-analysis of 24 RSA studies and 56 survival studies.

Authors:  Paul van der Voort; Bart G Pijls; Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Jorrit Jasper; Marta Fiocco; Josepha W M Plevier; Saskia Middeldorp; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  Total hip replacement: A meta-analysis to evaluate survival of cemented, cementless and hybrid implants.

Authors:  Phedy Phedy; H Dilogo Ismail; Charles Hoo; Yoshi P Djaja
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2017-02-18

7.  Analysis of the Risk of Wear on Cemented and Uncemented Polyethylene Liners According to Different Variables in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre; Loreto Barrios; Juan De la Torre-Mosquera; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega; Carlos González-Bravo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Cementless total hip replacement: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Harumoto Yamada; Yasuo Yoshihara; Osamu Henmi; Mitsuhiro Morita; Yuichiro Shiromoto; Tomoki Kawano; Arihiko Kanaji; Kennichi Ando; Masato Nakagawa; Naoto Kosaki; Eiichi Fukaya
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 1.601

9.  Cemented versus uncemented fixation in total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ali Abdulkarim; Prasad Ellanti; Nicola Motterlini; Tom Fahey; John M O'Byrne
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-03-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.