Literature DB >> 23224823

Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Ji Hae Lee1, Mark A McDaniel.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated the processes underlying prospective memory (PM) retrieval, focusing specifically on two possible spontaneous processes: discrepancy-plus-search and familiarity. Discrepancy was elicited by orthogonally manipulating the processing difficulties of the PM targets and the nontargets. Participants performed a PM task while solving anagrams with two levels of difficulty (easy or difficult). Assuming that the ease of processing easy anagrams would heighten a sense of familiarity, the familiarity view predicted better PM performance with easy anagrams as the PM targets. In contrast, the discrepancy-plus-search view predicted higher PM performance for the PM targets that were anagrams whose difficulty level mismatched that of the surrounding nontargets, as compared to PM targets whose difficulty matched that of the surrounding nontargets. This prediction was based on the idea that mismatching rather than matching difficulty levels would create discrepancy, thereby signaling significance for the target. Participants were more likely to perform the PM task for PM targets that were discrepant, supporting the discrepancy-plus-search view.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23224823     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-012-0273-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  22 in total

1.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Influences on the efficiency of prospective memory in younger and older adults.

Authors:  R West; F I Craik
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-12

3.  Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  M Kliegel; M Martin; M A McDaniel; G O Einstein
Journal:  Memory       Date:  2001-01

4.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

6.  Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Jennifer E Breneiser; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

7.  Control of cost in prospective memory: evidence for spontaneous retrieval processes.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Normal aging and prospective memory.

Authors:  G O Einstein; M A McDaniel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

10.  Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.

Authors:  M S Weldon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  6 in total

1.  Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: Unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

2.  The effects of enactment and intention accessibility on prospective memory performance.

Authors:  Janette C Schult; Melanie C Steffens
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-05

3.  Age-related changes in neural mechanisms of prospective memory.

Authors:  Bidhan Lamichhane; Mark A McDaniel; Emily R Waldum; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill Talley Shelton
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Aftereffects and deactivation of completed prospective memory intentions: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcus Möschl; Rico Fischer; Julie M Bugg; Michael K Scullin; Thomas Goschke; Moritz Walser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach.

Authors:  Marcel Kurtz; Stefan Scherbaum; Moritz Walser; Philipp Kanske; Marcus Möschl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-25
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.