Literature DB >> 17328382

Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Jennifer E Breneiser1, Mark A McDaniel.   

Abstract

Discrepancy processes may be helpful in noticing prospective memory targets (McDaniel, Guynn, Einstein, & Breneiser, 2004). We manipulated the discrepancy of prospective memory targets from the processing coherence established by the ongoing task by preexposing nontarget items in the ongoing task either five times (high discrepancy) or two times (low discrepancy). Prospective memory performance was significantly better in the high-discrepancy group than in the low-discrepancy group. These results support a discrepancy view of prospective remembering.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17328382     DOI: 10.3758/bf03194006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  9 in total

1.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: II. Expectation, uncertainty, surprise, and feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory.

Authors:  Rebekah E Smith; Ute J Bayen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

7.  Improving the reliability of event-based laboratory tests of prospective memory.

Authors:  William L Kelemen; W Bailey Weinberg; Hannah S Alford; Emily K Mulvey; Kevin F Kaeochinda
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-12

8.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

9.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns.

Authors:  A Paivio; J C Yuille; S A Madigan
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1968-01
  9 in total
  15 in total

1.  Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection.

Authors:  Gene A Brewer; Justin B Knight; Richard L Marsh; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

2.  Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: Unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-01

3.  Prospective memory and aging: preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation, in older adults.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

4.  A diffusion model analysis of task interference effects in prospective memory.

Authors:  C Dennis Boywitt; Jan Rummel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-01

5.  Discrepancy-plus-search processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Ji Hae Lee; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-04

6.  The impact of emotion on prospective memory and monitoring: no pain, big gain.

Authors:  Cynthia May; Max Owens; Gilles O Einstein
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-12

7.  Focal/nonfocal cue effects in prospective memory: monitoring difficulty or different retrieval processes?

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel; Jill T Shelton; Ji Hae Lee
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Minimizing the disruptive effects of prospective memory in simulated air traffic control.

Authors:  Shayne Loft; Rebekah E Smith; Roger W Remington
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Appl       Date:  2013-09

9.  Age-related changes in neural mechanisms of prospective memory.

Authors:  Bidhan Lamichhane; Mark A McDaniel; Emily R Waldum; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Whoops, I did it again: commission errors in prospective memory.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Julie M Bugg; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2011-11-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.