Literature DB >> 31886687

Aftereffects and deactivation of completed prospective memory intentions: A systematic review.

Marcus Möschl1, Rico Fischer1, Julie M Bugg2, Michael K Scullin3, Thomas Goschke1, Moritz Walser1.   

Abstract

Prospective memory, the ability to perform an intended action in the future, is an essential aspect of goal-directed behavior. Intentions influence our behavior and shape the way we process and interact with our environment. One important question for research on prospective memory and goal-directed behavior is whether this influence stops after the intention has been completed successfully. Are intention representations deactivated from memory after their completion, and if so, how? Here, we systematically review 20 years of research on intention deactivation and so-called aftereffects of completed intentions across different research fields to offer an integrative perspective on this topic. We first introduce the currently dominant accounts of aftereffects (inhibition vs. retrieval) and illustrate the paradigms, findings, and interpretations that these accounts developed from. We then review the evidence for each account based on the extant research in these paradigms. While early studies proposed a rapid deactivation or even inhibition of completed intentions, more recent studies mostly suggested that intentions continue to be retrieved even after completion and interfere with subsequent performance. Although these accounts of aftereffects seem mutually exclusive, we will show that they might be two sides of the same coin. That is, intention deactivation and the occurrence of aftereffects are modulated by a multitude of factors that either foster a rapid deactivation or lead to continued retrieval of completed intentions. Lastly, we outline future directions and novel experimental procedures for research on mechanisms and modulators of intention deactivation and discuss practical implications of our findings. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31886687      PMCID: PMC7007322          DOI: 10.1037/bul0000221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  75 in total

1.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Aliza Gordon; Alexander Jaudas; Carmen Hefer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-28

3.  The difficulty of letting go: moderators of the deactivation of completed intentions.

Authors:  Moritz Walser; Thomas Goschke; Rico Fischer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-08-11

4.  You better stop! Binding "stop" tags to irrelevant stimulus features.

Authors:  Carina Giesen; Klaus Rothermund
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions.

Authors:  Stefanie M Beck; Hannes Ruge; Moritz Walser; Thomas Goschke
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Commission errors of active intentions: the roles of aging, cognitive load, and practice.

Authors:  C Dennis Boywitt; Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-01-19

7.  Sensory-based mechanism for delayed motor intention.

Authors:  Arnaud Badets; Cédric T Albinet; Yannick Blandin
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2012-09-08

8.  Automatic effects of no-go instructions.

Authors:  Baptist Liefooghe; Jasper Degryse; Marijke Theeuwes
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2016-04-14

9.  The influence of patient adherence on anticoagulation control with warfarin: results from the International Normalized Ratio Adherence and Genetics (IN-RANGE) Study.

Authors:  Stephen E Kimmel; Zhen Chen; Maureen Price; Catherine S Parker; Joshua P Metlay; Jason D Christie; Colleen M Brensinger; Craig W Newcomb; Frederick F Samaha; Robert Gross
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2007-02-12

10.  Intention retrieval and deactivation following an acute psychosocial stressor.

Authors:  Moritz Walser; Rico Fischer; Thomas Goschke; Clemens Kirschbaum; Franziska Plessow
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The anterior midcingulate cortex might be a neuronal substrate for the ideomotor mechanism.

Authors:  T Michelet; A Badets
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociating sub-processes of aftereffects of completed intentions and costs to the ongoing task in prospective memory: A mouse-tracking approach.

Authors:  Marcel Kurtz; Stefan Scherbaum; Moritz Walser; Philipp Kanske; Marcus Möschl
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-02-25
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.