Literature DB >> 23916951

The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.

Michael K Scullin1, Mark A McDaniel, Jill Talley Shelton.   

Abstract

The ability to remember to execute delayed intentions is referred to as prospective memory. Previous theoretical and empirical work has focused on isolating whether a particular prospective memory task is supported either by effortful monitoring processes or by cue-driven spontaneous processes. In the present work, we advance the Dynamic Multiprocess Framework, which contends that both monitoring and spontaneous retrieval may be utilized dynamically to support prospective remembering. To capture the dynamic interplay between monitoring and spontaneous retrieval, we had participants perform many ongoing tasks and told them that their prospective memory cue may occur in any context. Following either a 20-min or a 12-h retention interval, the prospective memory cues were presented infrequently across three separate ongoing tasks. The monitoring patterns (measured as ongoing task cost relative to a between-subjects control condition) were consistent and robust across the three contexts. There was no evidence for monitoring prior to the initial prospective memory cue; however, individuals who successfully spontaneously retrieved the prospective memory intention, thereby realizing that prospective memory cues could be expected within that context, subsequently monitored. These data support the Dynamic Multiprocess Framework, which contends that individuals will engage monitoring when prospective memory cues are expected, disengage monitoring when cues are not expected, and that when monitoring is disengaged, a probabilistic spontaneous retrieval mechanism can support prospective remembering.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive control; Intentions; Monitoring; Prospective memory; Spontaneous retrieval

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23916951      PMCID: PMC3809757          DOI: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2013.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Psychol        ISSN: 0010-0285            Impact factor:   3.468


  69 in total

1.  The role of rehearsals in self-generated prospective memory tasks.

Authors:  Kaja Szarras; Agnieszka Niedźwieńska
Journal:  Int J Psychol       Date:  2011-05-24

2.  Individual differences in event-based prospective memory: Evidence for multiple processes supporting cue detection.

Authors:  Gene A Brewer; Justin B Knight; Richard L Marsh; Nash Unsworth
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-04

3.  A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms.

Authors:  J A Horne; O Ostberg
Journal:  Int J Chronobiol       Date:  1976

4.  Disruptions of preparatory attention contribute to failures of prospective memory.

Authors:  Robert West; Jason Krompinger; Ritvij Bowry
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-06

5.  Gone but not forgotten: the effects of cancelled intentions on the neural correlates of prospective memory.

Authors:  Robert West; M Windy McNerney; Stephanie Travers
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2006-11-14       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  The role of metacognition in prospective memory: anticipated task demands influence attention allocation strategies.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-07-13

7.  Performance predictions improve prospective memory and influence retrieval experience.

Authors:  Beat Meier; Philipp von Wartburg; Sibylle Matter; Nicolas Rothen; Rolf Reber
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2011-03

8.  Normal aging and prospective memory.

Authors:  G O Einstein; M A McDaniel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour.

Authors:  T Shallice; P Burgess
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory.

Authors:  A J Sellen; G Louie; J E Harris; A J Wilkins
Journal:  Memory       Date:  1997-07
View more
  51 in total

1.  An implementation intention strategy can improve prospective memory in older adults with very mild Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Ji Hae Lee; Jill T Shelton; Michael K Scullin; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2015-05-20

2.  Response dynamics in prospective memory.

Authors:  Drew H Abney; Dawn M McBride; Angela M Conte; David W Vinson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

3.  Rapid eye movement sleep mediates age-related decline in prospective memory consolidation.

Authors:  Michael K Scullin; Chenlu Gao; Paul Fillmore; R Lynae Roberts; Natalya Pruett; Donald L Bliwise
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 5.849

4.  Spontaneous future cognition: the past, present and future of an emerging topic.

Authors:  Scott Cole; Lia Kvavilashvili
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-05-11

Review 5.  From retrospective to prospective memory research: a framework for investigating the deactivation of intentions.

Authors:  Patrícia Matos; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2021-03-10

6.  The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.

Authors:  Julie M Bugg; B Hunter Ball
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-07

7.  The interplay of intention maintenance and cue monitoring in younger and older adults' prospective memory.

Authors:  Nicola Ballhausen; Katharina M Schnitzspahn; Sebastian S Horn; Matthias Kliegel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2017-10

8.  Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

9.  Aging and the strategic use of context to control prospective memory monitoring.

Authors:  B Hunter Ball; Julie M Bugg
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2018-05

10.  ERPs and their brain sources in perceptual and conceptual prospective memory tasks: Commonalities and differences between the two tasks.

Authors:  Gabriela Cruz; Makoto Miyakoshi; Scott Makeig; Kerry Kilborn; Jonathan Evans
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.