Literature DB >> 26304843

Spontaneous prospective-memory processing: Unexpected fluency experiences trigger erroneous intention executions.

Jan Rummel1, Thorsten Meiser2.   

Abstract

Event-based prospective memory is the ability to remember to execute an intention when an environmental cue occurs. It has been argued that, due to their special meaning, these cues are discrepant from their environment and therefore are sometimes spontaneously noticed. In line with this assumption, the likelihood that an intention will be executed increases with increased cue-discrepancy. It is not yet clear, however, whether these improvements are due to facilitated spontaneous noticing rather than to an increase in the efficiency of controlled cue-processing. To further investigate the spontaneous nature of cue-discrepancy benefits, we presented participants with stimuli that were unrelated to the intention but discrepant from other stimuli. Therefore, we experimentally increased the processing fluency of some stimuli for participants currently holding an intention by using different priming procedures. We found that stimuli whose fluency was increased via spaced repeated stimulus presentation (Experiment 1) or via short pre-exposure (Experiment 2a to 3) elicited a tendency to fulfill the intention despite its actual inappropriateness. Findings were inconsistent as to whether cue-memory uncertainty fosters the reliance on cue discrepancy for intention retrieval (Experiments 2a and 3). Taken together, the present findings provide converging evidence for a spontaneous discrepancy-based prospective-memory process which works independent of controlled processes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Discrepancy-plus-search; Processing fluency; Prospective memory; Spontaneous noticing

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26304843     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0546-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  30 in total

1.  The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings of familiarity.

Authors:  B W Whittlesea; L D Williams
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Mark A McDaniel; Melissa J Guynn; Gilles O Einstein; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval.

Authors:  Gilles O Einstein; Mark A McDaniel; Ruthann Thomas; Sara Mayfield; Hilary Shank; Nova Morrisette; Jennifer Breneiser
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-08

4.  Discrepancy processes in prospective memory retrieval.

Authors:  Jennifer E Breneiser; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-10

5.  Automaticity: a theoretical and conceptual analysis.

Authors:  Agnes Moors; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Number of cues influences the cost of remembering to remember.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Alexander Jaudas; Peter M Gollwitzer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-01

7.  Complex span and n-back measures of working memory: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Thomas S Redick; Dakota R B Lindsey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

8.  The role of metacognition in prospective memory: anticipated task demands influence attention allocation strategies.

Authors:  Jan Rummel; Thorsten Meiser
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2013-07-13

9.  Normal aging and prospective memory.

Authors:  G O Einstein; M A McDaniel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Beyond monitoring: after-effects of responding to prospective memory targets.

Authors:  Beat Meier; Alodie Rey-Mermet
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2012-10-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.

Authors:  Anna-Lisa Cohen; Aliza Gordon; Alexander Jaudas; Carmen Hefer; Gesine Dreisbach
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-01-28
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.