Literature DB >> 23224628

Risk factors for permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Sang Woo Lim1, Hun Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Jung Wook Huh, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the risk factors influencing permanent stoma after curative resection of rectal cancer and compared the long-term survival of patients according to the stoma state.
METHODS: From January 2004 to December 2010, 895 consecutive rectal cancer patients with histological-confirmed adenocarcinoma who received low anterior resection with curative intent at the Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, were evaluated retrospectively. Patient demographics, times of stoma reversal, and number/reason of permanent stoma were evaluated.
RESULTS: Three hundred fifteen patients (35.2 %) had a diverting stoma of temporary intent among 895 rectal adenocarcinoma patients. Loop ileostomy was performed in 271 patients (86.0 %). A total of 256 (81.3 %) of 315 stoma patients received stoma closure. The mean period between primary surgery and stoma closure was 5.6 months (range, 1-44 months). Seventy-three patients (23.2 %) were confirmed with permanent stoma. Multivariate analysis showed stage IV (hazard ratio (HR), 3.380; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.192-18.023; p = 0.027), anastomosis-related complication (HR, 3.299; 95 % CI, 1.397-7.787; p = 0.006), colostomy type (HR, 7.276, 95 % CI, 2.454-21.574; p = 0.000), systemic metastasis (HR, 2.698; 95 % CI, 1.1.288-5.653; p = 0.009), and local recurrence (HR, 4.231; 95 % CI, 1.724-10.383; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors for permanent stoma.
CONCLUSIONS: On postoperative follow-up, in patients with anastomotic complication, tumor progression with local recurrences and systemic metastasis may cause permanent stoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23224628     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-012-1038-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  17 in total

1.  The indications for a diverting stoma in low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a prospective multicentre study of 222 patients from Japanese cancer centers.

Authors:  A Shiomi; M Ito; N Saito; T Hirai; M Ohue; Y Kubo; Y Takii; T Sudo; M Kotake; Y Moriya
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Conservative management is associated with a decreased risk of definitive stoma after anastomotic leakage complicating sphincter-saving resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  L Maggiori; F Bretagnol; J H Lefèvre; M Ferron; E Vicaut; Y Panis
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Permanent diversion rates after neoadjuvant therapy and coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R Scott Nelson; Elena Boland; B Mark Ewing; Garnet J Blatchford; Charles Ternent; M Shashidharan; N Anh Tran; Jennifer Beaty; Alan G Thorson
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.565

4.  Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; R D Ryall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Delayed anastomotic leakage following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Ui Sup Shin; Chan Wook Kim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Theodor Junginger; Ursula Gönner; Tong T Trinh; André Lollert; Katja Oberholzer; Manfred Berres
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  What is the risk for a permanent stoma after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer? A six-year follow-up of a multicenter trial.

Authors:  Rickard Lindgren; Olof Hallböök; Jörgen Rutegård; Rune Sjödahl; Peter Matthiessen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  Permanent stoma not only affects patients' quality of life but also that of their spouses.

Authors:  Atıl Cakmak; Gökçe Aylaz; M Ayhan Kuzu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Loop ileostomy following anterior resection: is it really temporary?

Authors:  G G David; J P Slavin; S Willmott; D J Corless; A U Khan; C R Selvasekar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 3.788

10.  Quality of life among five-year survivors after treatment for very low rectal cancer with or without a permanent abdominal stoma.

Authors:  C Fucini; R Gattai; C Urena; L Bandettini; C Elbetti
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-08       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  22 in total

1.  Changing operative strategy from abdominoperineal resection to sphincter preservation in T3 low rectal cancer after downstaging by neoadjuvant chemoradiation: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Khaled M Madbouly; Ahmed M Hussein
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic versus open reintervention for anastomotic leakage following minimally invasive colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Chul Min Lee; Jung Wook Huh; Seong Hyeon Yun; Hee Cheol Kim; Woo Yong Lee; Yoon Ah Park; Yong Beom Cho; Ho-Kyung Chun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Low Rectal Cancers: Incidence and Risk Factors for Permanent Stoma.

Authors:  Joanna Chung Kiu Mak; Dominic Chi Chung Foo; Rockson Wei; Wai Lun Law
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Low anterior resection combined with a covering stoma in the treatment of rectal cancer reduces the risk of permanent anastomotic failure.

Authors:  Minna Räsänen; Laura Renkonen-Sinisalo; Monika Carpelan-Holmström; Anna Lepistö
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With the Nonreversal Ileostomy Following Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Young Ah Kim; Gil Jae Lee; Sung Won Park; Won-Suk Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-30

6.  Revised risk factors and patient characteristics for failure to close a defunctioning ileostomy following low anterior resection for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Alex Barenboim; Ravit Geva; Hagit Tulchinsky
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Preoperative risk stratification of permanent stoma in patients with non-metastatic mid and low rectal cancer undergoing curative resection and a temporary stoma.

Authors:  Shu-Huan Huang; Kun-Yu Tsai; Tzong-Yun Tsai; Jeng-Fu You; Chien-Yuh Yeh; Pao-Shiu Hsieh; Reiping Tang; Jy-Ming Chiang; Wen-Sy Tsai
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Satoshi Okada; Keisuke Hata; Shigenobu Emoto; Koji Murono; Manabu Kaneko; Kazuhito Sasaki; Kensuke Otani; Takeshi Nishikawa; Toshiaki Tanaka; Kazushige Kawai; Hiroaki Nozawa
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.549

9.  Permanent stoma: a quality outcome in treatment of rectal cancer and its impact on length of stay.

Authors:  Riccardo Lemini; Iktej S Jabbal; Krystof Stanek; Shalmali R Borkar; Aaron C Spaulding; Scott R Kelley; Dorin T Colibaseanu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Intestinal stoma in patients with colorectal cancer from the perspective of 20-year period of clinical observation.

Authors:  Zbigniew Banaszkiewicz; Łukasz P Woda; Tomasz Zwoliński; Krzysztof Tojek; Paweł Jarmocik; Arkadiusz Jawień
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.