Literature DB >> 20387070

Delayed anastomotic leakage following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer.

Ui Sup Shin1, Chan Wook Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to investigate the characteristics of patients who developed delayed anastomotic leakage (DAL) following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer. We evaluated the following factors: (1) the incidence of DAL, (2) the clinical features of patients who developed DAL, (3) the risk factors for DAL, and (4) treatment outcomes.
METHODS: We reviewed the case histories of 1,838 rectal cancer patients who had undergone curative resection with sphincter preservation and without protective stoma formation between January 2000 and December 2006. DAL was defined as the development of a pelvic abscess or fistula around the anastomosis more than 3 weeks post-surgery in patients without tumor recurrence who had resumed a normal diet and defecation.
RESULTS: In 1.3% (24/1,838) of the patients, DAL developed on median postoperative day 99 (range 22-2,069). Pelvic abscess (50%) and anastomotic-vaginal fistula (41.7%) were the most common causes of DAL. Independent risk factors for the development of DAL were: (1) female gender (hazard ratio 3.03; 95% CI 1.06-8.8), (2) low-level anastomosis (< or = 4 cm from the anal verge) (hazard ratio 5.76; 95% CI 1.37-22.39), and (3) preoperative chemoradiation therapy (hazard ratio 4.56; 95% CI 1.4-14.92). Stoma formation was performed in all of the 24 patients. The 3-year stoma-retention rate in patients with DAL was significantly higher than in patients with early anastomotic leakage (72.2% vs 17.5%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: DAL following sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer occurred relatively frequently in our sample and was associated with female gender, a low level of anastomosis, and preoperative radiotherapy. DAL patients required long-term or permanent stomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20387070     DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-0938-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  24 in total

1.  Anastomotic leakage following routine mesorectal excision for rectal cancer in a national cohort of patients.

Authors:  M T Eriksen; A Wibe; J Norstein; J Haffner; J N Wiig
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Anastomotic leakage and functional outcome after anterior resection of the rectum.

Authors:  O Hallböök; R Sjödahl
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 6.939

3.  Risk factors and oncologic impact of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Sang Hun Jung; Chang Sik Yu; Pyong Wha Choi; Dae Dong Kim; In Ja Park; Hee Cheol Kim; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2008-04-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Risk factors for, and management of anastomotic leakage in rectal surgery.

Authors:  B J Moran; R J Heald
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.788

5.  Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision.

Authors:  W I Law; K W Chu; J W Ho; C W Chan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Improvement of colonic healing by preoperative rectal irrigation with short-chain fatty acids in rats given radiotherapy.

Authors:  Cem Terzi; Ali Ibrahim Sevinç; Hilal Koçdor; Gülgün Oktay; Hilmi Alanyali; Ali Küpelioğlu; Gül Ergör; Mehmet Füzün
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients.

Authors:  A Vignali; V W Fazio; I C Lavery; J W Milsom; J M Church; T L Hull; S A Strong; J R Oakley
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 6.113

8.  Anastomotic leakage is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Kenneth G Walker; Stephen W Bell; Matthew J F X Rickard; Daniel Mehanna; Owen F Dent; Pierre H Chapuis; E Leslie Bokey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Early postoperative results of surgery for rectal carcinoma as a function of the distance of the tumor from the anal verge: results of a multicenter prospective evaluation.

Authors:  Frank Marusch; Andreas Koch; Uwe Schmidt; Hubertus Wenisch; Michael Ernst; Thomas Manger; Stefanie Wolff; Matthias Pross; Jörg Tautenhahn; Ingo Gastinger; Hans Lippert
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Double stapling technique for low anterior resection.

Authors:  Z Cohen; E Myers; B Langer; B Taylor; R H Railton; C Jamieson
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.585

View more
  14 in total

1.  Diverting stoma with anterior resection for rectal cancer: does it reduce overall anastomotic leakage and leaks requiring laparotomy?

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Ming Zhong; Lu Chen
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

Review 2.  Incidence and mortality of anastomotic dehiscence requiring reoperation after rectal carcinoma resection.

Authors:  Zhi-jie Cong; Liang-hao Hu; Jun-jie Xing; Zheng-qian Bian; Chuan-gang Fu; En-da Yu; Zhao-shen Li; Ming Zhong
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2014 Mar-Apr

3.  Multivariate Analysis of Risk Factors Associated With the Nonreversal Ileostomy Following Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Young Ah Kim; Gil Jae Lee; Sung Won Park; Won-Suk Lee; Jeong-Heum Baek
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-06-30

4.  Omission of neoadjuvant radiotherapy for clinical T2/N1 and T3N0/1 middle and low rectal cancers with safe circumferential resection margins.

Authors:  Kyung-Ha Lee; Jin-Soo Kim; Ji-Yeon Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 1.766

5.  Risk factors for permanent stoma after low anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang Woo Lim; Hun Jin Kim; Chang Hyun Kim; Jung Wook Huh; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Rectovaginal Fistula with Anastomotic Stricture Post Anterior Resection - Sphincter Preservation, a Viable Option.

Authors:  Vishwas Pai; Ashwin Desouza; Jean Louis De Menezes; Avanish Saklani
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-03-18

7.  Consensus on the definition of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A modified Delphi study.

Authors:  Claire Pm van Helsdingen; Audrey Chm Jongen; Wouter J de Jonge; Nicole D Bouvy; Joep Pm Derikx
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  German S3-Guideline: rectovaginal fistula.

Authors:  Andreas Ommer; Alexander Herold; Eugen Berg; Alois Fürst; Thomas Schiedeck; Marco Sailer
Journal:  Ger Med Sci       Date:  2012-10-29

9.  Systematic review of anastomotic leakage rate according to an international grading system following anterior resection for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhi-Jie Cong; Liang-Hao Hu; Zheng-Qian Bian; Guang-Yao Ye; Min-Hao Yu; Yun-He Gao; Zhao-Shen Li; En-Da Yu; Ming Zhong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Delayed anastomotic leakage following laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for lower rectal cancer: report of four cases and literature review.

Authors:  Masayoshi Iwamoto; Kenji Kawada; Koya Hida; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 2.754

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.