Literature DB >> 23208532

A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography.

Menglong Zhang1, Kai Liu, Xuecai Niu, Xinli Liu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little information exists concerning appropriate exposure and measuring overall patient dose in pediatric digital radiography.
OBJECTIVE: To establish a convenient method of appropriate exposure from target exposure index (EI) and thickness in pediatric digital radiography and estimate patient entrance-surface dose (ESD) and dose-area product (DAP) associated with chest, abdomen and pelvis radiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A formula was deduced to calculate appropriate mAs changed with children's weight and height. EI was used to control image quality. With this formula, dose-optimized procedures were carried out. Data were collected from 180 pediatric examinations, including chest, abdomen and pelvis anterior-posterior (AP) projections. The children were divided into the following age bands: newborns (0-28 days), infants (28 days-2 years) and older children (2-7 years). In each age band, ten children were exposed with the calculated appropriate mAs and EI values were kept steady in appropriate range (referred as target group) and ten children were exposed to the factors routinely used in practice (referred to as the routine group). DAP to children was measured with a DAP meter, and ESD was calculated using measured DAP and data from the National Radiological Protection Board. Data were compared between groups.
RESULTS: ESD ranges in the target group were 32-202 μGy (chest AP), 57-333 μGy (abdomen AP) and 52-372 μGy (pelvis AP). For every radiographic procedure, chi-square Student's t tests showed a significant difference in average ESD and DAP between the two groups (P < 0.005). Most ESD values from the routine group were two times higher than those from the target group.
CONCLUSIONS: The study established a convenient method to set appropriate exposure parameters (mAs) to reach a target EI using the child's weight and height in pediatric radiography. By this method, ESD and DAP can be significantly reduced in children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23208532     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-012-2555-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  12 in total

1.  The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population.

Authors:  J Anthony Seibert; Richard L Morin
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-04-14

2.  Optimization of the radiological protection of patients undergoing digital radiography.

Authors:  Menglong Zhang; Cunkun Chu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Effective doses to patients from paediatric cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  J Rassow; A A Schmaltz; F Hentrich; C Streffer
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  A comparison of doses and techniques between specialist and non-specialist centres in the diagnostic X-ray imaging of children.

Authors:  J C Kyriou; M Fitzgerald; A Pettett; J V Cook; S M Pablot
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Dose reduction in a paediatric X-ray department following optimization of radiographic technique.

Authors:  R Mooney; P S Thomas
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Radiation dose and cancer risk to children undergoing skull radiography.

Authors:  Michael Mazonakis; John Damilakis; Maria Raissaki; Nicholas Gourtsoyiannis
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-06-12

7.  Paediatric entrance doses from exposure index in computed radiography.

Authors:  E Vano; D Martinez; J M Fernandez; J M Ordiales; C Prieto; A Floriano; J I Ten
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  A study of the relationship between patient dose and size in paediatric radiology.

Authors:  C J Martin; B Farquhar; E Stockdale; S MacDonald
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.

Authors:  Sinead E Peters; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-12-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Digital chest radiography: an update on modern technology, dose containment and control of image quality.

Authors:  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop; Ulrich Neitzel; Henk W Venema; Martin Uffmann; Mathias Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

1.  Portable abdomen radiography: moving to thickness-based protocols.

Authors:  Adrian A Sánchez; Ingrid Reiser; Tina Baxter; Yue Zhang; Joshua H Finkle; Zheng Feng Lu; Kate A Feinstein
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-11-12

Review 2.  Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.

Authors:  Ursula Mothiram; Patrick C Brennan; Sarah J Lewis; Bernadette Moran; John Robinson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-05-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.