Literature DB >> 12195499

Digital radiography: are the manufacturers' settings too high? Optimisation of the Kodak digital radiography system with aid of the computed radiography dose index.

Sinead E Peters1, Patrick C Brennan.   

Abstract

Manufacturers offer exposure indices as a safeguard against overexposure in computed radiography, but the basis for recommended values is unclear. This study establishes an optimum exposure index to be used as a guideline for a specific CR system to minimise radiation exposures for computed mobile chest radiography, and compares this with manufacturer guidelines and current practice. An anthropomorphic phantom was employed to establish the minimum milliamperes consistent with acceptable image quality for mobile chest radiography images. This was found to be 2 mAs. Consecutively, 10 patients were exposed with this optimised milliampere value and 10 patients were exposed with the 3.2 mAs routinely used in the department of the study. Image quality was objectively assessed using anatomical criteria. Retrospective analyses of 717 exposure indices recorded over 2 months from mobile chest examinations were performed. The optimised milliampere value provided a significant reduction of the average exposure index from 1840 to 1570 ( p<0.0001). This new "optimum" exposure index is substantially lower than manufacturer guidelines of 2000 and significantly lower than exposure indices from the retrospective study (1890). Retrospective data showed a significant increase in exposure indices if the examination was performed out of hours. The data provided by this study emphasise the need for clinicians and personnel to consider establishing their own optimum exposure indices for digital investigations rather than simply accepting manufacturers' guidelines. Such an approach, along with regular monitoring of indices, may result in a substantial reduction in patient exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12195499     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-001-1230-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  7 in total

1.  Reducing dose in urography while maintaining image quality-a comparison of storage phosphor plates and a flat-panel detector.

Authors:  Margareta Jansson; Håkan Geijer; Jan Persliden; Torbjörn Andersson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Creating accountability in image quality analysis part 1: the technology paradox.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Dependence of radiographic sensitivity of CR imaging plate on X-ray tube voltage.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Asai; Masanobu Uemura; Masao Matsumoto; Hitoshi Kanamori
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2007-12-11

4.  A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography.

Authors:  Menglong Zhang; Kai Liu; Xuecai Niu; Xinli Liu
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2012-12-04

5.  Optimising the use of computed radiography in pediatric chest imaging.

Authors:  R Sanchez Jacob; E Vano-Galvan; E Vano; N Gomez Ruiz; J M Fernandez Soto; D Martinez Barrio; C Prieto
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.

Authors:  Ursula Mothiram; Patrick C Brennan; Sarah J Lewis; Bernadette Moran; John Robinson
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2014-05-11

7.  Retrospective evaluation of exposure index (EI) values from plain radiographs reveals important considerations for quality improvement.

Authors:  Ursula Mothiram; Patrick C Brennan; John Robinson; Sarah J Lewis; Bernadette Moran
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2013-11-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.