Literature DB >> 23206168

Using E-Z reader to examine word skipping during reading.

Erik D Reichle1, Denis Drieghe.   

Abstract

The question of why readers sometimes skip words has important theoretical implications for our understanding of perception, cognition, and oculomotor control during reading (Drieghe, Rayner, & Pollatsek, 2005). In this article, the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading (Reichle, 2011) was used to examine the behavioral consequences of word skipping on fixation durations. The simulations suggest that skipping "cost," or inflated fixation durations immediately prior to skips, is modulated by the lexical properties of the upcoming word (i.e., longer fixations before skipping infrequent and/or long words; Kliegl & Engbert, 2005) but that contrary to previous claims (e.g., Reichle & Laurent, 2006), "accidental" skips due to motor error also produce skipping cost. In contrast, the cost associated with having skipped a word was not modulated by that word's properties. These simulations suggest that skipping behavior is even more complicated than previously has been assumed and that further empirical research is needed to understand the causal link between skipping and its associated cost. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23206168      PMCID: PMC3832990          DOI: 10.1037/a0030910

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  22 in total

1.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Jane Ashby; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Parafoveal processing in reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Bernhard Angele; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Parafoveal-on-foveal effects in normal reading.

Authors:  Alan Kennedy; Joël Pynte
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Eye movements and word skipping during reading revisited.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Fixation durations before word skipping in reading.

Authors:  Reinhold Kliegl; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-02

7.  The influence of number of syllables on word skipping during reading.

Authors:  Gemma Fitzsimmons; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

8.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

9.  Mislocated fixations can account for parafoveal-on-foveal effects in eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Denis Drieghe; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.143

10.  The zoom lens of attention: Simulating shuffled versus normal text reading using the SWIFT model.

Authors:  Daniel J Schad; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-05-23
View more
  8 in total

1.  Failure to detect function word repetitions and omissions in reading: Are eye movements to blame?

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sophia Dodge; Andrew L Cohen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-02

2.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the concurrent development of eye-movement control and reading skill.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Simon P Liversedge; Denis Drieghe; Hazel I Blythe; Holly S S L Joseph; Sarah J White; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Dev Rev       Date:  2013-06

4.  Skipping syntactically illegal the previews: The role of predictability.

Authors:  Matthew J Abbott; Bernhard Angele; Y Danbi Ahn; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Prediction as a basis for skilled reading: insights from modern language models.

Authors:  Benedetta Cevoli; Chris Watkins; Kathleen Rastle
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 3.653

6.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

7.  Anticipating syntax during reading: Evidence from the boundary change paradigm.

Authors:  Trevor Brothers; Matthew J Traxler
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Predicting eye-movement characteristics across multiple tasks from working memory and executive control.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Emily S Darowski; Shawn D Gale
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.