Nuclear Resonance Vibrational Spectroscopy (NRVS) is a sensitive vibrational probe for biologically important heme complexes. The exquisite sensitivity of the NRVS data to the electronic structure provides detailed insights into the nature of these interesting compounds, but requires highly accurate computational methods for the mode assignments. To determine the best combinations of density functionals and basis sets, a series of benchmark DFT calculations on the previously characterized complex [Fe(OEP)NO] (OEP(2-)=octaethylporphyrinatio dianion) were performed. A test set of 21 methodology combinations including 8 functionals (BP86, mPWPW91, B3LYP, PBE1PBE, M062X, M06L, LC-BP86 and ωB97X-D) and 5 basis set (VTZ, TZVP, Lanl2DZ for iron and 6-31G*, 6-31+G* for other atoms) was carried out to calculate electronic structures and vibrational frequencies. We also implemented the conversion of frequency calculations into orientation-selective mode composition factors (e(2)), which can used to simulate the Vibrational Density Of States (VDOS) using Gaussian normal distribution functions. These use a series of user-friendly scripts for their application to NRVS. The structures as well as the isotropic and anisotropic NRVS of [Fe(OEP)NO] obtained with the M06L functional with a variety of basis sets are found to best reproduce the available experimental data, followed by B3LYP/LanL2DZ calculations. Other density functionals and basis sets do not produce the same level of accuracy. The noticeably worse agreement between theory and experiment for the out-plane NRVS compared with the excellent performance of the M06L functional for the in-plane prediction is attributed to deficiencies of the physical model rather than the computational methodology.
Nuclear Resonance Vibrational Spectroscopy (NRVS) is a sensitive vibrational probe for biologically important heme complexes. The exquisite sensitivity of the NRVS data to the electronic structure provides detailed insights into the nature of these interesting compounds, but requires highly accurate computational methods for the mode assignments. To detern class="Chemical">mine the best combinations of density functionals and basis sets, a series of benchmark DFT calculations on the previously characterized complex [Fe(OEP)NO] (OEP(2-)=octaethylporphyrinatio dianion) were performed. A test set of 21 methodology combinations including 8 functionals (BP86, mPWPW91, B3LYP, PBE1PBE, M062X, M06L, LC-BP86 and ωB97X-D) and 5 basis set (VTZ, TZVP, Lanl2DZ for iron and 6-31G*, 6-31+G* for other atoms) was carried out to calculate electronic structures and vibrational frequencies. We also implemented the conversion of frequency calculations into orientation-selective mode composition factors (e(2)), which can used to simulate the Vibrational Density Of States (VDOS) using Gaussian normal distribution functions. These use a series of user-friendly scripts for their application to NRVS. The structures as well as the isotropic and anisotropic NRVS of [Fe(OEP)NO] obtained with the M06L functional with a variety of basis sets are found to best reproduce the available experimental data, followed by B3LYP/LanL2DZ calculations. Other density functionals and basis sets do not produce the same level of accuracy. The noticeably worse agreement between theory and experiment for the out-plane NRVS compared with the excellent performance of the M06L functional for the in-plane prediction is attributed to deficiencies of the physical model rather than the computational methodology.
Authors: Jeffrey W Pavlik; Alexander Barabanschikov; Allen G Oliver; E Ercan Alp; Wolfgang Sturhahn; Jiyong Zhao; J Timothy Sage; W Robert Scheidt Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: H Paulsen; R Benda; C Herta; V Schünemann; A I Chumakov; L Duelund; H Winkler; H Toftlund; A X Trautwein Journal: Phys Rev Lett Date: 2001-02-12 Impact factor: 9.161
Authors: Brajesh K Rai; Stephen M Durbin; Earl W Prohofsky; J Timothy Sage; Mary K Ellison; Arne Roth; W Robert Scheidt; Wolfgang Sturhahn; E Ercan Alp Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2003-06-11 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Bogdan M Leu; Marek Z Zgierski; Graeme R A Wyllie; W Robert Scheidt; Wolfgang Sturhahn; E Ercan Alp; Stephen M Durbin; J Timothy Sage Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2004-04-07 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Yuming Xiao; Ming-Liang Tan; Toshiko Ichiye; Hongxin Wang; Yisong Guo; Matt C Smith; Jacques Meyer; Wolfgang Sturhahn; Ercan E Alp; Jiyong Zhao; Yoshitaka Yoda; Stephen P Cramer Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2008-06-24 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Qian Peng; Ming Li; Chuanjiang Hu; Jeffrey W Pavlik; Allen G Oliver; E Ercan Alp; Michael Y Hu; Jiyong Zhao; J Timothy Sage; W Robert Scheidt Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2013-09-10 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Bogdan M Leu; Marek Z Zgierski; Christian Bischoff; Ming Li; Michael Y Hu; Jiyong Zhao; Steve W Martin; Esen Ercan Alp; W Robert Scheidt Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Qian Peng; Jeffrey W Pavlik; Nathan J Silvernail; E Ercan Alp; Michael Y Hu; Jiyong Zhao; J Timothy Sage; W Robert Scheidt Journal: Chemistry Date: 2016-03-21 Impact factor: 5.236
Authors: Saumen Chakraborty; Julian Reed; J Timothy Sage; Nicole C Branagan; Igor D Petrik; Kyle D Miner; Michael Y Hu; Jiyong Zhao; E Ercan Alp; Yi Lu Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2015-08-14 Impact factor: 5.165
Authors: Hideaki Ogata; Tobias Krämer; Hongxin Wang; David Schilter; Vladimir Pelmenschikov; Maurice van Gastel; Frank Neese; Thomas B Rauchfuss; Leland B Gee; Aubrey D Scott; Yoshitaka Yoda; Yoshihito Tanaka; Wolfgang Lubitz; Stephen P Cramer Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2015-08-10 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jianfeng Li; Qian Peng; Allen G Oliver; E Ercan Alp; Michael Y Hu; Jiyong Zhao; J Timothy Sage; W Robert Scheidt Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2014-12-18 Impact factor: 15.419