Literature DB >> 2319956

Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology.

G Lukatela1, M T Turvey.   

Abstract

Ten experiments were conducted on visually presented Serbo-Croatian words and pseudowords, comprising phonemically similar and dissimilar context-target sequences. There were five main results. First, phonemic similarity effects in both lexical decision and naming are independent of graphemic similarity. Second, phonemic similarity need not facilitate lexical decision; the direction of its effect depends on lexicality, target frequency, and type of similarity (specifically, the position of the phoneme that distinguishes context and target). Third, phonemic similarity expedites the naming of words and pseudowords, and to the same degree. Fourth, phonemic similarity is negated in naming, but not in lexical decision, when the visually presented context and target are stressed differently. Fifth, the phonemic similarity effect occurs even when the context is a masked pseudoword. These results are discussed in terms of a model in which word-processing units are activated routinely by phoneme-processing units, and in which compositionally similar word units, when activated, inhibit one another in proportion to each's familiarity. In this model, the phonemic similarity effect in naming is based on the states of phoneme units, whereas the phonemic similarity effect in lexical decision is based on the states of word units. Overall, the results comport with an account in which phonology is computed prelexically and automatically.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2319956     DOI: 10.3758/bf03197089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  26 in total

1.  Allocation of attention during visual word recognition.

Authors:  C A Becker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt; M G Ruddy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-03

3.  Strategies for visual word recognition and orthographical depth: a multilingual comparison.

Authors:  R Frost; L Katz; S Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Phonological coding in word reading: evidence from hearing and deaf readers.

Authors:  V L Hanson; C A Fowler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

5.  Word recognition: context effects without priming.

Authors:  D Norris
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-03

6.  Hemispheric asymmetries in phonological processing.

Authors:  G Lukatela; C Carello; M Savić; M T Turvey
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Robust effects of syntactic structure on visual word processing.

Authors:  R F West; K E Stanovich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-03

8.  On priming by a sentence context.

Authors:  K E Stanovich; R F West
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1983-03

9.  The interaction of pronunciation rules and lexical representations in reading aloud.

Authors:  M B Rosson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1985-01

10.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-02
View more
  8 in total

1.  When SOFA primes TOUCH: interdependence of spelling, sound, and meaning in "semantically mediated" phonological priming.

Authors:  W T Farrar; G C Van Orden; V Hamouz
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-04

2.  Phonological and semantic priming: evidence for task-independent effects.

Authors:  A Rouibah; G Tiberghien; S J Lupker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Inhibition of naming by rhyming primes.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

4.  Effects of association, frequency, and stimulus quality on naming words in the presence or absence of pseudowords.

Authors:  C Carello; G Lukatela; M Peter; M T Turvey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-05

5.  Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG.

Authors:  G Lukatela; K Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-05

6.  A study of masked form priming in picture and word naming.

Authors:  L Ferrand; J Grainger; J Segui
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-07

7.  Phonological codes are early sources of constraint in visual semantic categorization.

Authors:  M Peter; M T Turvey
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-05

8.  Word recognition in two languages and orthographies: English and Greek.

Authors:  H F Chitiri; D M Willows
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1994-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.