Literature DB >> 8332414

Further evidence for phonological constraints on visual lexical access: TOWED primes FROG.

G Lukatela1, K Lukatela, M T Turvey.   

Abstract

If the phonological codes of visually presented words are assembled rapidly and automatically for use in lexical access, then words that sound alike should induce similar activity within the internal lexicon. TOWED is homophonous with TOAD, which is semantically related to FROG, and BEACH is homophonous with BEECH, which is semantically related to TREE. Stimuli such as these were used in priming-of-naming task, in which words homophonous with associates of the target words preceded the targets at an onset asynchrony of 100 msec. Relative to spelling controls (TROD, BENCH), the low-frequency TOWED and the high-frequency BEACH speeded up the naming of FROG and TREE, respectively, to the same degree. This result was discussed in relation to the accumulating evidence for the primacy of phonological constraints in visual lexical access.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8332414     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205193

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  9 in total

Review 1.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; B F Pennington; G O Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-03

4.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

5.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; J C Johnston; B L Hale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-02

8.  The effects of graphemic and phonemic similarity between targets and masks in a backward visual masking paradigm.

Authors:  P Naish
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  K R Paap; S L Newsome; J E McDonald; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

  9 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Phonological coding during reading.

Authors:  Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Orthographically influenced abstract phonological representation: evidence from non-rhotic speakers.

Authors:  Marcus Taft
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2006-01

3.  Looks aren't everything: pseudohomophones prime words but nonwords do not.

Authors:  Laree A Huntsman
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2007-01

4.  Strategic reliance on phonological mediation in lexical access.

Authors:  V C Milota; A A Widau; M R McMickell; J F Juola; G B Simpson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-05

5.  Visual and phonological pathways to the lexicon: evidence from Chinese readers.

Authors:  K J Leck; B S Weekes; M J Chen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1995-07

6.  Paws + cause = pause? Memory load and memory blends in homophone recognition.

Authors:  Tamiko Azuma; Erica J Williams; Juliet E Davie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-08
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.