Literature DB >> 10355233

Phonological and semantic priming: evidence for task-independent effects.

A Rouibah1, G Tiberghien, S J Lupker.   

Abstract

The questions asked in the present experiments concern the generality of semantic and phonological priming effects: Do these effects arise automatically regardless of target task, or are these effects restricted to target tasks that specifically require the retrieval of the primed information? In Experiment 1, subjects produced faster color matching times on targets preceded by a masked rhyming prime than on targets preceded by an orthographic control or an unrelated prime. This result suggests that automatic priming effects on the basis of phonological similarity can be obtained even when the target task does not make use of phonological information. This claim was reinforced in Experiment 2 in which a rhyme priming effect and a semantic priming effect were found in a semantic categorization task. In Experiment 3, the target task was phonological (rhyme detection), and, again, both phonological and semantic priming effects were observed. Finally, in Experiments 4 and 5, in a replication and an extension of Experiment 1, phonological and semantic priming effects were found in a color matching task, a task involving neither phonological nor semantic processing. These results are most straightforwardly interpreted by assuming that both semantic and phonological priming effects are, at least in part, due to automatic activation of memorial representations.

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10355233     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211538

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs.

Authors:  R Frost; S Bentin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Functions of graphemic and phonemic codes in visual word-recognition.

Authors:  D E Meyer; R W Schvaneveldt; M G Ruddy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-03

4.  Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.

Authors:  J H Neely; D E Keefe; K L Ross
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

6.  Phonological priming in the lexical decision task: a failure to replicate.

Authors:  R C Martin; C R Jensen
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1988-11

7.  Automatic access of semantic information by phonological codes in visual word recognition.

Authors:  M F Lesch; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual lexical access is initially phonological: 1. Evidence from associative priming by words, homophones, and pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1994-06

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  4 in total

1.  The role of syllabic structure in French visual word recognition.

Authors:  A Rouibah; M Taft
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

2.  Silent letters and phonological priming.

Authors:  Chang H Lee; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2003-05

3.  Multiple dimensions of relatedness among words: Conjoint effects of form and meaning in word recognition.

Authors:  Matthew John Pastizzo; Laurie Beth Feldman
Journal:  Ment Lex       Date:  2009-11-01

4.  Word Distance Affects Subjective Temporal Distance.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yu Liu; Jun Wang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-12-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.