Literature DB >> 8008551

Phonological codes are early sources of constraint in visual semantic categorization.

M Peter1, M T Turvey.   

Abstract

Two experiments were directed at early phonological activation in the semantic categorization task. In Experiment 1, briefly exposed targets homophonic to category exemplars (ROWS for the category A FLOWER), and their graphemic controls (ROBS), were judged for category membership with and without a backward pattern mask. False positives were greater for ROWS than ROBS to the same degree under both unmasked and masked conditions. In Experiment 2, false positives were examined in the semantic categorization task under backward dichoptic masking by pseudowords that were, in turn, masked monoptically by a pattern mask. Briefly exposed homophones (e.g., WEAK), masked by a phonologically similar pseudoword ("feek"), a graphemic control ("felk"), or an unrelated pseudoword ("furt"), were categorized as category exemplars (A UNIT OF TIME). The difference in false positives was significant for WEAK-feek versus WEAK-furt, but not for WEAK-felk versus WEAK-furt. It was suggested that the persistence of the homophonic effects under the pattern masking of Experiment 1 and their amplification under the phonological masking of Experiment 2 were because phonological codes cohere rapidly and provide, thereby, immediately available constraints on semantic processing.

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8008551     DOI: 10.3758/bf03205307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  12 in total

Review 1.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; B F Pennington; G O Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Phonological access of the lexicon: evidence from associative priming with pseudohomophones.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Is alphabet biasing in bialphabetical word perception automatic and prelexical?

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey; D Todorović
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Phonemic similarity effects and prelexical phonology.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1990-03

5.  A ROWS is a ROSE: spelling, sound, and reading.

Authors:  G C Van Orden
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1987-05

6.  Neural dynamics of word recognition and recall: attentional priming, learning, and resonance.

Authors:  S Grossberg; G Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Central sources of visual masking: indexing structures supporting seeing at a single, brief glance.

Authors:  C F Michaels; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  1979

8.  Word identification in reading proceeds from spelling to sound to meaning.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; J C Johnston; B L Hale
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.051

9.  Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.

Authors:  G Lukatela; M T Turvey
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-02
View more
  2 in total

1.  Implicit memory for phonological processes in visual stem completion.

Authors:  J G Rueckl; S Mathew
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-01

2.  Strategic reliance on phonological mediation in lexical access.

Authors:  V C Milota; A A Widau; M R McMickell; J F Juola; G B Simpson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.