Literature DB >> 36053392

Changes in Corticospinal Excitability and Motor Control During Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Healthy Individuals.

Keita Takano1,2, Natsuki Katagiri2, Takatsugu Sato2, Masafumi Jin1, Tadaki Koseki1, Daisuke Kudo1, Kaito Yoshida3, Shigeo Tanabe4, Masahiro Tsujikawa2, Kunitsugu Kondo2, Tomofumi Yamaguchi5.   

Abstract

Cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation (ctDCS) modulates the primary motor cortex (M1) via cerebellar brain inhibition (CBI), which affects motor control in humans. However, the effects of ctDCS on motor control are inconsistent because of an incomplete understanding of the real-time changes in the M1 excitability that occur during ctDCS, which determines motor output under regulation by the cerebellum. This study investigated changes in corticospinal excitability and motor control during ctDCS in healthy individuals. In total, 37 healthy individuals participated in three separate experiments. ctDCS (2 mA) was applied to the cerebellar hemisphere during the rest condition or a pinch force-tracking task. Motor-evoked potential (MEP) amplitude and the F-wave were assessed before, during, and after ctDCS, and pinch force control was assessed before and during ctDCS. The MEP amplitudes were significantly decreased during anodal ctDCS from 13 min after the onset of stimulation, whereas the F-wave was not changed. No significant changes in MEP amplitudes were observed during cathodal and sham ctDCS conditions. The MEP amplitudes were decreased during anodal ctDCS when combined with the pinch force-tracking task, and pinch force control was impaired during anodal ctDCS relative to sham ctDCS. The MEP amplitudes were not significantly changed before and after all ctDCS conditions. Motor cortical excitability was suppressed during anodal ctDCS, and motor control was unskilled during anodal ctDCS when combined with a motor task in healthy individuals. Our findings provided a basic understanding of the clinical application of ctDCS to neurorehabilitation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebellar brain inhibition; Primary motor cortex; Spinal excitability; Transcranial direct current stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2022        PMID: 36053392     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01469-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.648


  57 in total

1.  Modulation by applied electric fields of Purkinje and stellate cell activity in the isolated turtle cerebellum.

Authors:  C Y Chan; C Nicholson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The effect of the anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the cerebellum on the motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Mehlika Panpalli Ates; Halil Can Alaydin; Bulent Cengiz
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  Human locomotor adaptive learning is proportional to depression of cerebellar excitability.

Authors:  Gowri Jayaram; Joseph M Galea; Amy J Bastian; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Effects of cerebellar transcranial direct current stimulation on cerebellar-brain inhibition in humans: A systematic evaluation.

Authors:  Giorgi Batsikadze; Zeynab Rezaee; Dae-In Chang; Marcus Gerwig; Stefan Herlitze; Anirban Dutta; Michael A Nitsche; Dagmar Timmann
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Cerebellar brain inhibition is decreased in active and surround muscles at the onset of voluntary movement.

Authors:  Panagiotis Kassavetis; Britt S Hoffland; Tabish A Saifee; Kailash P Bhatia; Bart P van de Warrenburg; John C Rothwell; Mark J Edwards
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effects of electric fields on transmembrane potential and excitability of turtle cerebellar Purkinje cells in vitro.

Authors:  C Y Chan; J Hounsgaard; C Nicholson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 8.  Soft robotic devices for hand rehabilitation and assistance: a narrative review.

Authors:  Chia-Ye Chu; Rita M Patterson
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of a robotic device for finger training in patients with subacute stroke.

Authors:  Marco Germanotta; Valerio Gower; Dionysia Papadopoulou; Arianna Cruciani; Cristiano Pecchioli; Rita Mosca; Gabriele Speranza; Catuscia Falsini; Francesca Cecchi; Federica Vannetti; Angelo Montesano; Silvia Galeri; Furio Gramatica; Irene Aprile
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.