Literature DB >> 23184192

Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records.

Kelly Caine1, Rima Hanania.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess patients' desire for granular level privacy control over which personal health information should be shared, with whom, and for what purpose; and whether these preferences vary based on sensitivity of health information.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A card task for matching health information with providers, questionnaire, and interview with 30 patients whose health information is stored in an electronic medical record system. Most patients' records contained sensitive health information.
RESULTS: No patients reported that they would prefer to share all information stored in an electronic medical record (EMR) with all potential recipients. Sharing preferences varied by type of information (EMR data element) and recipient (eg, primary care provider), and overall sharing preferences varied by participant. Patients with and without sensitive records preferred less sharing of sensitive versus less-sensitive information. DISCUSSION: Patients expressed sharing preferences consistent with a desire for granular privacy control over which health information should be shared with whom and expressed differences in sharing preferences for sensitive versus less-sensitive EMR data. The pattern of results may be used by designers to generate privacy-preserving EMR systems including interfaces for patients to express privacy and sharing preferences.
CONCLUSIONS: To maintain the level of privacy afforded by medical records and to achieve alignment with patients' preferences, patients should have granular privacy control over information contained in their EMR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23184192      PMCID: PMC3555326          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  6 in total

1.  Personal health information management: consumers' perspectives.

Authors:  Andrea Civan; Meredith M Skeels; Anna Stolyar; Wanda Pratt
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

2.  Health-information exchange: why are we doing it, and what are we doing?

Authors:  Gilad J Kuperman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Privacy, confidentiality, and electronic medical records.

Authors:  R C Barrows; P D Clayton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  A method to implement fine-grained access control for personal health records through standard relational database queries.

Authors:  Walter V Sujansky; Sam A Faus; Ethan Stone; Patricia Flatley Brennan
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 6.317

Review 5.  Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions.

Authors:  Albert Boonstra; Manda Broekhuis
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  A research agenda for personal health records (PHRs).

Authors:  David C Kaelber; Ashish K Jha; Douglas Johnston; Blackford Middleton; David W Bates
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 4.497

  6 in total
  73 in total

1.  The Smart Health Initiative in China: The Case of Wuhan, Hubei Province.

Authors:  Meiyu Fan; Jian Sun; Bin Zhou; Min Chen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Patient Experiences Using an Inpatient Personal Health Record.

Authors:  Janet Woollen; Jennifer Prey; Lauren Wilcox; Alexander Sackeim; Susan Restaino; Syed T Raza; Suzanne Bakken; Steven Feiner; George Hripcsak; David Vawdrey
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Privacy Policy and Technology in Biomedical Data Science.

Authors:  April Moreno Arellano; Wenrui Dai; Shuang Wang; Xiaoqian Jiang; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci       Date:  2018-07

4.  Designing a patient-centered user interface for access decisions about EHR data: implications from patient interviews.

Authors:  Kelly Caine; Spencer Kohn; Carrie Lawrence; Rima Hanania; Eric M Meslin; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Patient preferences in controlling access to their electronic health records: a prospective cohort study in primary care.

Authors:  Peter H Schwartz; Kelly Caine; Sheri A Alpert; Eric M Meslin; Aaron E Carroll; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Designing a system for patients controlling providers' access to their electronic health records: organizational and technical challenges.

Authors:  Jeremy C Leventhal; Jonathan A Cummins; Peter H Schwartz; Douglas K Martin; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Point and counterpoint: patient control of access to data in their electronic health records.

Authors:  Kelly Caine; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Patient informed governance of distributed research networks: results and discussion from six patient focus groups.

Authors:  Laura A Mamo; Dennis K Browe; Holly C Logan; Katherine K Kim
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2013-11-16

9.  How bioethics principles can aid design of electronic health records to accommodate patient granular control.

Authors:  Eric M Meslin; Peter H Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Provider responses to patients controlling access to their electronic health records: a prospective cohort study in primary care.

Authors:  William M Tierney; Sheri A Alpert; Amy Byrket; Kelly Caine; Jeremy C Leventhal; Eric M Meslin; Peter H Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.