BACKGROUND: Electronic health records change the landscape of patient data sharing and privacy by increasing the amount of information collected and stored and the number of potential recipients. Patients desire granular control over who receives what information in their electronic health record (EHR), but there are no current patient interfaces that allow them to record their preferences for EHR access. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to derive the user needs of patients regarding the design of a user interface that records patients' individual choices about who can access data in their EHRs. DESIGN: We used semi-structured interviews. SETTING: The study was conducted in Central Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with data stored in an EHR, the majority of whom (70 %) had highly sensitive health EHR data, were included in the study. APPROACH: We conducted a thematic and quantitative analysis of transcribed interview data. KEY RESULTS: Patients rarely knew what data were in their EHRs, but would have liked to know. They also wanted to be able to control who could access what information in their EHR and wanted to be notified when their data we re accessed. CONCLUSIONS: We derived six implications for the design of a patient-centered tool to allow individual choice in the disclosure of EHR: easy patient access to their EHRs; an overview of current EHR sharing permissions; granular, hierarchical control over EHR access; EHR access controls based on dates; contextual privacy controls; and notification when their EHRs are accessed.
BACKGROUND: Electronic health records change the landscape of patient data sharing and privacy by increasing the amount of information collected and stored and the number of potential recipients. Patients desire granular control over who receives what information in their electronic health record (EHR), but there are no current patient interfaces that allow them to record their preferences for EHR access. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to derive the user needs of patients regarding the design of a user interface that records patients' individual choices about who can access data in their EHRs. DESIGN: We used semi-structured interviews. SETTING: The study was conducted in Central Indiana. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients with data stored in an EHR, the majority of whom (70 %) had highly sensitive health EHR data, were included in the study. APPROACH: We conducted a thematic and quantitative analysis of transcribed interview data. KEY RESULTS:Patients rarely knew what data were in their EHRs, but would have liked to know. They also wanted to be able to control who could access what information in their EHR and wanted to be notified when their data we re accessed. CONCLUSIONS: We derived six implications for the design of a patient-centered tool to allow individual choice in the disclosure of EHR: easy patient access to their EHRs; an overview of current EHR sharing permissions; granular, hierarchical control over EHR access; EHR access controls based on dates; contextual privacy controls; and notification when their EHRs are accessed.
Authors: William M Tierney; Eduard J Beck; Reed M Gardner; Beverly Musick; Mark Shields; Naomi M Shiyonga; Mark H Spohr Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-02-24 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Eric M Meslin; Sheri A Alpert; Aaron E Carroll; Jere D Odell; William M Tierney; Peter H Schwartz Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: Kirk Roberts; Mary Regina Boland; Lisiane Pruinelli; Jina Dcruz; Andrew Berry; Mattias Georgsson; Rebecca Hazen; Raymond F Sarmiento; Uba Backonja; Kun-Hsing Yu; Yun Jiang; Patricia Flatley Brennan Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: William M Tierney; Sheri A Alpert; Amy Byrket; Kelly Caine; Jeremy C Leventhal; Eric M Meslin; Peter H Schwartz Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jennifer L Wolff; Jonathan D Darer; Andrea Berger; Deserae Clarke; Jamie A Green; Rebecca A Stametz; Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497