Literature DB >> 25480724

How bioethics principles can aid design of electronic health records to accommodate patient granular control.

Eric M Meslin1, Peter H Schwartz.   

Abstract

Ethics should guide the design of electronic health records (EHR), and recognized principles of bioethics can play an important role. This approach was recently adopted by a team of informaticists who are designing and testing a system where patients exert granular control over who views their personal health information. While this method of building ethics in from the start of the design process has significant benefits, questions remain about how useful the application of bioethics principles can be in this process, especially when principles conflict. For instance, while the ethical principle of respect for autonomy supports a robust system of granular control, the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence counsel restraint due to the danger of patients being harmed by restrictions on provider access to data. Conflict between principles has long been recognized by ethicists and has even motivated attacks on approaches that state and apply principles. In this paper, we show how using ethical principles can help in the design of EHRs by first explaining how ethical principles can and should be used generally, and then by discussing how attention to details in specific cases can show that the tension between principles is not as bad as it initially appeared. We conclude by suggesting ways in which the application of these (and other) principles can add value to the ongoing discussion of patient involvement in their health care. This is a new approach to linking principles to informatics design that we expect will stimulate further interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25480724      PMCID: PMC4265222          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3062-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  14 in total

1.  (Almost) everything you ever wanted to know about informed consent. [Review of: Faden, RR and Beauchamp, TL. A history and theory of informed concsent. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986].

Authors:  A M Capron
Journal:  Med Humanit Rev       Date:  1987-01

2.  Ethics of implementing Electronic Health Records in developing countries: points to consider.

Authors:  Martin C Were; Eric M Meslin
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2011-10-22

Review 3.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Ethical questions must be considered for electronic health records.

Authors:  Merle Spriggs; Michael V Arnold; Christopher M Pearce; Craig Fry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Patients must have control of their medical records.

Authors:  Mohammad Al-Ubaydli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-08-21

6.  Sounding Boards. Confidentiality in medicine--a decrepit concept.

Authors:  M Siegler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-12-09       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Patient preferences in controlling access to their electronic health records: a prospective cohort study in primary care.

Authors:  Peter H Schwartz; Kelly Caine; Sheri A Alpert; Eric M Meslin; Aaron E Carroll; William M Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Ethical issues and the electronic health record.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Layman
Journal:  Health Care Manag (Frederick)       Date:  2008 Apr-Jun

9.  Giving patients granular control of personal health information: using an ethics 'Points to Consider' to inform informatics system designers.

Authors:  Eric M Meslin; Sheri A Alpert; Aaron E Carroll; Jere D Odell; William M Tierney; Peter H Schwartz
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Kelly Caine; Rima Hanania
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  8 in total

1.  Barbarians at the Gate: Consumer-Driven Health Data Commons and the Transformation of Citizen Science.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  2016-11

2.  You, me, and the computer makes three: navigating the doctor-patient relationship in the age of electronic health records.

Authors:  Adam Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Power to the People: Data Citizens in the Age of Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Barbara J Evans
Journal:  Vanderbilt J Entertain Technol Law       Date:  2017

4.  The anatomy of electronic patient record ethics: a framework to guide design, development, implementation, and use.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 2.652

5.  Developing a Questionnaire for Iranian Women's Attitude on Medical Ethics in Vaginal Childbirth.

Authors:  Firoozeh Mirzaee Rabor; Ali Taghipour; Moghaddameh Mirzaee; Khadigeh Mirzaii Najmabadi; Masoud Fazilat Pour; Seyed Hosein Fattahi Masoum
Journal:  Nurs Midwifery Stud       Date:  2015-12-01

6.  Generating unique IDs from patient identification data using security models.

Authors:  Emad A Mohammed; Jonathan C Slack; Christopher T Naugler
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-12-30

7.  Examination and diagnosis of electronic patient records and their associated ethics: a scoping literature review.

Authors:  Tim Jacquemard; Colin P Doherty; Mary B Fitzsimons
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  3MD for Chronic Conditions, a Model for Motivational mHealth Design: Embedded Case Study.

Authors:  Guido Giunti
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 4.143

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.