Literature DB >> 25480723

Point and counterpoint: patient control of access to data in their electronic health records.

Kelly Caine1, William M Tierney.   

Abstract

Information collection, storage, and management is central to the practice of health care. For centuries, patients' and providers' expectations kept medical records confidential between providers and patients. With the advent of electronic health records, patient health information has become more widely available to providers and health care managers and has broadened its potential use beyond individual patient care. Adhering to the principles of Fair Information Practice, including giving patients control over the availability and use of their individual health records, would improve care by fostering the sharing of sensitive information between patients and providers. However, adherence to such principles could put patients at risk for unsafe care as a result of both missed opportunities for providing needed care as well as provision of contraindicated care, as it would prevent health care providers from having full access to health information. Patients' expectations for the highest possible quality and safety of care, therefore, may be at odds with their desire to limit provider access to their health records. Conversely, provider expectations that patients would willingly seek care for embarrassing conditions and disclose sensitive information may be at odds with patients' information privacy rights. An open dialogue between patients and providers will be necessary to balance respect for patient rights with provider need for patient information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25480723      PMCID: PMC4265223          DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-3061-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  21 in total

1.  Concern about security and privacy, and perceived control over collection and use of health information are related to withholding of health information from healthcare providers.

Authors:  Israel T Agaku; Akinyele O Adisa; Olalekan A Ayo-Yusuf; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Time and the patient-physician relationship.

Authors:  D C Dugdale; R Epstein; S Z Pantilat
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Privacy Concerns and Disclosure Behavior in a Health Setting.

Authors:  Kelly E Caine; Kaylee E Burnham; Arthur D Fisk; Wendy A Rogers
Journal:  Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet       Date:  2008-09

4.  The "five minute" consultation: effect of time constraint on clinical content and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  D C Morrell; M E Evans; R W Morris; M O Roland
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-03-29

5.  Analysis of medical decision making: a cognitive perspective on medical informatics.

Authors:  A Kushniruk; V Patel; D Fleiszer
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1995

6.  The 'chagrin factor' and qualitative decision analysis.

Authors:  A R Feinstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-07

7.  Provider responses to patients controlling access to their electronic health records: a prospective cohort study in primary care.

Authors:  William M Tierney; Sheri A Alpert; Amy Byrket; Kelly Caine; Jeremy C Leventhal; Eric M Meslin; Peter H Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Improving the electronic health record--are clinicians getting what they wished for?

Authors:  James J Cimino
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The double-edged sword of electronic health records: implications for patient disclosure.

Authors:  Celeste Campos-Castillo; Denise L Anthony
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Patients want granular privacy control over health information in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Kelly Caine; Rima Hanania
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  7 in total

1.  Too Much or Too Little? How Much Control Should Patients Have Over EHR Data?

Authors:  Soumitra Sudip Bhuyan; Sandra Bailey-DeLeeuw; David K Wyant; Cyril F Chang
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  You, me, and the computer makes three: navigating the doctor-patient relationship in the age of electronic health records.

Authors:  Adam Wright
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Data Withholding in the Age of Digital Health.

Authors:  David Blumenthal
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.911

4.  From battlefield to home: a mobile platform for assessing brain health.

Authors:  Helaine E Resnick; Corinna E Lathan
Journal:  Mhealth       Date:  2016-07-22

5.  Assessment of Doctors' Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Confidentiality in Hospital Care.

Authors:  Cristina M Beltran-Aroca; Fernando Labella; Pilar Font-Ugalde; Eloy Girela-Lopez
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.525

6.  iCONCUR: informed consent for clinical data and bio-sample use for research.

Authors:  Hyeoneui Kim; Elizabeth Bell; Jihoon Kim; Amy Sitapati; Joe Ramsdell; Claudiu Farcas; Dexter Friedman; Stephanie Feudjio Feupe; Lucila Ohno-Machado
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Evaluating the Balance Between Privacy and Access in Digital Information Sharing.

Authors:  Sarah J Beesley; Alex Powell; Danielle Groat; Jorie Butler; Ramona O Hopkins; Ronen Rozenblum; Hanan Aboumatar; Allison M Butler; Jeremy Sugarman; Leslie Francis; Samuel M Brown
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 9.296

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.