Literature DB >> 23181684

Persistence of value-driven attentional capture.

Brian A Anderson1, Steven Yantis.   

Abstract

Stimuli that have previously been associated with the delivery of reward involuntarily capture attention when presented as unrewarded and task-irrelevant distractors in a subsequent visual search task. It is unknown how long such effects of reward learning on attention persist. One possibility is that value-driven attentional biases are plastic and constantly evolve to reflect only recent reward history. According to such a mechanism of attentional control, only consistently reinforced patterns of attention allocation persist for extended periods of time. Another possibility is that reward learning creates enduring changes in attentional priority that can persist indefinitely without further learning. Here we provide evidence for an enduring effect of reward learning on attentional priority: stimuli previously associated with reward in a training phase capture attention when presented as irrelevant distractors over half a year later, without the need for further reward learning. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23181684      PMCID: PMC3989924          DOI: 10.1037/a0030860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  23 in total

1.  Reward creates oculomotor salience.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Wieske van Zoest
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05-05

3.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity.

Authors:  J Theeuwes
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-08

4.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

5.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task.

Authors:  Ruth M Krebs; Carsten N Boehler; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-09-22

7.  Attentional bias for drug cues in opiate dependence.

Authors:  D I Lubman; L A Peters; K Mogg; B P Bradley; J F Deakin
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Generalization of value-based attentional priority.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2012-01-01

9.  Dissociable effects of reward on attentional learning: from passive associations to active monitoring.

Authors:  Chiara Della Libera; Andrea Perlato; Leonardo Chelazzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Patryk A Laurent; Steven Yantis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  63 in total

1.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Reward, attention, and HIV-related risk in HIV+ individuals.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Sharif I Kronemer; Jessica J Rilee; Ned Sacktor; Cherie L Marvel
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 5.996

3.  The role of reward prediction in the control of attention.

Authors:  Anthony W Sali; Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Mechanisms of habitual approach: Failure to suppress irrelevant responses evoked by previously reward-associated stimuli.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Charles L Folk; Rebecca Garrison; Leeland Rogers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2016-04-07

5.  Attentional bias for nondrug reward is magnified in addiction.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Monica L Faulkner; Jessica J Rilee; Steven Yantis; Cherie L Marvel
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 3.157

6.  Figure-Ground Modulation in the Human Lateral Geniculate Nucleus Is Distinguishable from Top-Down Attention.

Authors:  Sonia Poltoratski; Alexander Maier; Allen T Newton; Frank Tong
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Value-based attentional capture influences context-dependent decision-making.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Napat Rangsipat; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Social comparison modulates reward-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Jun Jiao; Feng Du; Xiaosong He; Kan Zhang
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

9.  Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Haena Kim; Mark K Britton; Andy Jeesu Kim
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-06-12

Review 10.  HOW DO RADIOLOGISTS USE THE HUMAN SEARCH ENGINE?

Authors:  Jeremy M Wolfe; Karla K Evans; Trafton Drew; Avigael Aizenman; Emilie Josephs
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 0.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.