Literature DB >> 25711184

Social comparison modulates reward-driven attentional capture.

Jun Jiao1,2, Feng Du3, Xiaosong He1, Kan Zhang1.   

Abstract

It is well established that attention can be captured by task irrelevant and non-salient objects associated with value through reward learning. However, it is unknown whether social comparison influences reward-driven attentional capture. The present study created four social contexts to examine whether different social comparisons modulate the reward-driven capture of attention. The results showed that reward-driven attentional capture varied with different social comparison conditions. Most prominently, reward-driven attentional capture is dramatically reduced in the disadvantageous social comparison context, in which an individual is informed that the other participant is earning more monetary reward for performing the same task. These findings suggest that social comparison can affect the reward-driven capture of attention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Involuntary attentional capture; Reward; Reward-driven attentional capture; Social comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25711184     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0812-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  14 in total

Review 1.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.

Authors:  Maurizio Corbetta; Gordon L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Eye movements to smoking-related cues: effects of nicotine deprivation.

Authors:  Matt Field; Karin Mogg; Brendan P Bradley
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-12-09       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Out of control: attentional selection for orientation is thwarted by properties of the underlying neural mechanisms.

Authors:  Feng Du; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-06-14

4.  Hold the future, let the past go: attention prefers the features of future targets.

Authors:  Feng Du; Kan Zhang; Richard A Abrams
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-02-16

5.  Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum.

Authors:  K Fliessbach; B Weber; P Trautner; T Dohmen; U Sunde; C E Elger; A Falk
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Review. The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: some current issues.

Authors:  Terry E Robinson; Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-10-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.

Authors:  G R Loftus; M E Masson
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1994-12

8.  The envious brain: the neural basis of social comparison.

Authors:  Jonathan Dvash; Gadi Gilam; Aharon Ben-Ze'ev; Talma Hendler; Simone G Shamay-Tsoory
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude.

Authors:  Hidehiko Takahashi; Motoichiro Kato; Masato Matsuura; Dean Mobbs; Tetsuya Suhara; Yoshiro Okubo
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Persistence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Social reward shapes attentional biases.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.065

3.  On the value-dependence of value-driven attentional capture.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Madeline Halpern
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Exploring reward-related attention selectivity deficits in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Matthew J D Pilgrim; Zhen-Yi Andy Ou; Madeleine Sharp
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-21       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.