Literature DB >> 31190092

Measuring attention to reward as an individual trait: the value-driven attention questionnaire (VDAQ).

Brian A Anderson1, Haena Kim2, Mark K Britton2, Andy Jeesu Kim2.   

Abstract

Reward history is a powerful determinant of what we pay attention to. This influence of reward on attention varies substantially across individuals, being related to a variety of personality variables and clinical conditions. Currently, the ability to measure and quantify attention-to-reward is restricted to the use of psychophysical laboratory tasks, which limits research into the construct in a variety of ways. In the present study, we introduce a questionnaire designed to provide a brief and accessible means of assessing attention-to-reward. Scores on the questionnaire correlate with other measures known to be related to attention-to-reward and predict performance on multiple laboratory tasks measuring the construct. In demonstrating this relationship, we also provide evidence that attention-to-reward as measured in the lab, an automatic and implicit bias in information processing, is related to overt behaviors and motivations in everyday life as assessed via the questionnaire. Variation in scores on the questionnaire is additionally associated with a distinct biomarker in brain connectivity, and the questionnaire exhibits acceptable test-retest reliability. Overall, the Value-Driven Attention Questionnaire (VDAQ) provides a useful proxy-measure of attention-to-reward that is much more accessible than typical laboratory assessments.

Year:  2019        PMID: 31190092      PMCID: PMC6906260          DOI: 10.1007/s00426-019-01212-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  75 in total

1.  How does reward compete with goal-directed and stimulus-driven shifts of attention?

Authors:  Alexia Bourgeois; Rémi Neveu; Dimitri J Bayle; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2015-09-24

2.  Reward breaks through center-surround inhibition via anterior insula.

Authors:  Lihui Wang; Hongbo Yu; Jie Hu; Jan Theeuwes; Xiaoliang Gong; Yang Xiang; Changjun Jiang; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Reward representations and reward-related learning in the human brain: insights from neuroimaging.

Authors:  John P O'Doherty
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Selective visual attention and motivation: the consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task.

Authors:  Jane E Raymond; Jennifer L O'Brien
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-06-22

5.  Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale.

Authors:  J H Patton; M S Stanford; E S Barratt
Journal:  J Clin Psychol       Date:  1995-11

7.  Dopamine responses comply with basic assumptions of formal learning theory.

Authors:  P Waelti; A Dickinson; W Schultz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Value-based modulations in human visual cortex.

Authors:  John T Serences
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-12-26       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  The attribution of value-based attentional priority in individuals with depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson; Stephanie L Leal; Michelle G Hall; Michael A Yassa; Steven Yantis
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Decreased functional connectivity between ventral tegmental area and nucleus accumbens in Internet gaming disorder: evidence from resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jin-Tao Zhang; Shan-Shan Ma; Sarah W Yip; Ling-Jiao Wang; Chao Chen; Chao-Gan Yan; Lu Liu; Ben Liu; Lin-Yuan Deng; Qin-Xue Liu; Xiao-Yi Fang
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 3.759

View more
  4 in total

1.  Awareness is necessary for attentional biases by location-reward association.

Authors:  Chisato Mine; Takemasa Yokoyama; Yuji Takeda
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Evaluating individual differences in rewarded Stroop performance: reliability and associations with self-report measures.

Authors:  Brent Pitchford; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-06-16

3.  Arousal-Biased Competition Explains Reduced Distraction by Reward Cues under Threat.

Authors:  Andy J Kim; Brian A Anderson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2020-07-07

Review 4.  Relating value-driven attention to psychopathology.

Authors:  Brian A Anderson
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2020-07-21
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.