Literature DB >> 15744451

Gender differences in trabecular bone architecture of the distal radius assessed with magnetic resonance imaging and implications for mechanical competence.

Martin Hudelmaier1, A Kollstedt, E M Lochmüller, V Kuhn, F Eckstein, T M Link.   

Abstract

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (hrMRI) has recently made it possible to evaluate trabecular bone structure in vivo. Despite obvious gender differences in fracture incidence at the distal radius, little is known about gender differences in trabecular bone microarchitecture and its relationship to the structural strength of the forearm. The aim of this study was to determine trabecular bone structure in the distal radius of elderly women and men and its correlation with failure loads of the distal radius as determined in a fall configuration. Specifically, we tested the hypotheses that structural indices differ between women and men and that they offer information that is independent from BMD for predicting structural strength. Intact right arms were obtained from 73 formalin-fixed cadavers (age 80+/-11 years, 43 women, 30 men). Trabecular structural indices (apparent bone volume fraction [app. BV/TV], trabecular number [app. Tb.N], trabecular separation [app. Tb.Sp], trabecular thickness [app. Tb.Th] and fractal dimension [Frac.Dim]) were assessed in the distal metaphysis, using hrMRI with 156 microm in-plane resolution and proprietary digital image analysis, while BMD was measured with dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Women displayed significantly lower BMD (-29.8%, p <0.001), app. BV/TV (-8.2%, p <0.05) and app. Tb.Th (-10.2%, p <0.001) than men, whereas app. Tb.N, app. Tb.Sp. and fractal dimension did not differ significantly. Structural parameters differed between normal and osteopenic women (BV/TV: -11%, p <0.01; Tb.Th: -8%, p <0.001) and between normal and osteoporotic women BV/TV: -21%, p <0.001; Tb.Th: -16%, p <0.001). App. BV/TV, app. Tb.Th and fractal dimension provided information independent from BMD in the prediction of radial failure loads in multiple regression models. These findings imply that it should be of clinical interest to monitor both bone mass and trabecular microstructure for predicting osteoporotic fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15744451     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-004-1823-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  35 in total

1.  Can geometry-based parameters from pQCT and material parameters from quantitative ultrasound (QUS) improve the prediction of radial bone strength over that by bone mass (DXA)?

Authors:  M Hudelmaier; V Kuhn; E M Lochmüller; H Well; M Priemel; T M Link; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-01-22       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  S Majumdar; M Kothari; P Augat; D C Newitt; T M Link; J C Lin; T Lang; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics.

Authors:  S Majumdar; D Newitt; A Mathur; D Osman; A Gies; E Chiu; J Lotz; J Kinney; H Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  High resolution magnetic resonance imaging of the calcaneus: age-related changes in trabecular structure and comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements.

Authors:  X Ouyang; K Selby; P Lang; K Engelke; C Klifa; B Fan; F Zucconi; G Hottya; M Chen; S Majumdar; H K Genant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.333

5.  Probability-based structural parameters from three-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance images as predictors of trabecular bone strength.

Authors:  S N Hwang; F W Wehrli; J L Williams
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Fractal analysis of radiographic trabecular bone texture and bone mineral density: two complementary parameters related to osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  C L Benhamou; S Poupon; E Lespessailles; S Loiseau; R Jennane; V Siroux; W Ohley; L Pothuaud
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Estimation of wrist fracture load using phalangeal speed of sound: an in vitro study.

Authors:  C F Njeh; C Wu; B Fan; D Hans; T Fuerst; Y He; H K Genant
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Distal radius fractures: mechanisms of injury and strength prediction by bone mineral assessment.

Authors:  P Augat; H Iida; Y Jiang; E Diao; H K Genant
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Correlations between photon absorption properties and failure load of the distal radius in vitro.

Authors:  E R Myers; E A Sebeny; A T Hecker; T A Corcoran; J A Hipp; S L Greenspan; W C Hayes
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 4.333

10.  Formalin fixation effects on vertebral bone density and failure mechanics: an in-vitro study of human and sheep vertebrae.

Authors:  S J Edmondston; K P Singer; R E Day; P D Breidahl; R I Price
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.063

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  [New techniques for the diagnosis of osteoporosis].

Authors:  A S Issever; T M Link
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.

Authors:  Chantal M J de Bakker; Wei-Ju Tseng; Yihan Li; Hongbo Zhao; X Sherry Liu
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Cortical and trabecular bone structure analysis at the distal radius-prediction of biomechanical strength by DXA and MRI.

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Melanie Kutscher; Dirk Müller; Christoph Räth; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.626

4.  Differences of bone mass and bone structure in osteopenic rat models caused by spinal cord injury and ovariectomy.

Authors:  S-D Jiang; C Shen; L-S Jiang; L-Y Dai
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Julio Carballido-Gamio; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Sex differences in trabecular bone microarchitecture are not detected in pre and early pubertal children using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christopher M Modlesky; Deepti Bajaj; Joshua T Kirby; Brianne M Mulrooney; David A Rowe; Freeman Miller
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  Assessment of bone fragility with clinical imaging modalities.

Authors:  Xn Dong; X Wang
Journal:  Hard Tissue       Date:  2013-02-15

8.  Experimental hip fracture load can be predicted from plain radiography by combined analysis of trabecular bone structure and bone geometry.

Authors:  P Pulkkinen; T Jämsä; E-M Lochmüller; V Kuhn; M T Nieminen; F Eckstein
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-09-22       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Trabecular bone structure analysis of the spine using clinical MDCT: can it predict vertebral bone strength?

Authors:  Thomas Baum; Martin Gräbeldinger; Christoph Räth; Eduardo Grande Garcia; Rainer Burgkart; Janina M Patsch; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-04-20       Impact factor: 2.626

10.  Falls: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and relationship to fracture.

Authors:  Sarah D Berry; Ram R Miller
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 5.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.