Literature DB >> 16059627

Effects of salmon calcitonin on trabecular microarchitecture as determined by magnetic resonance imaging: results from the QUEST study.

Charles H Chesnut1, Sharmilla Majumdar, David C Newitt, Andrew Shields, Jan Van Pelt, Ellen Laschansky, Moise Azria, Audrey Kriegman, Melvin Olson, Erik F Eriksen, Linda Mindeholm.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The unique noninvasive MRI technique was used to assess trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites in 91 postmenopausal osteoporotic women receiving nasal spray salmon calcitonin (CT-NS) or placebo over 2 years. In the distal radius and lower trochanter of the hip, individuals treated with CT-NS exhibited significant preservation of trabecular bone microarchitecture compared with placebo, where significant deterioration was shown. MRI analyses of os calcis or microCT/histomorphometric analyses of bone biopsies did not reveal consistent differences in architecture between CT-NS and placebo.
INTRODUCTION: It is postulated that the reduction in osteoporotic fracture risk in response to certain antiresorptive osteoporosis therapies is caused less by effects on bone quantity than on bone quality (specifically trabecular microarchitecture). To test this hypothesis, the QUEST study was conducted to assess the effects of nasal spray salmon calcitonin (CT-NS) or placebo on parameters of trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites using noninvasive MRI technology and iliac crest bone biopsies by microCT/histomorphometry.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-one postmenopausal osteoporotic women were followed for 2 years (n = 46 for CT-NS, n = 45 for placebo); all women received 500 mg calcium daily. MRI measurements at distal radius, hip (T2 relaxation time [T2*]), and os calcis (obtained yearly), iliac crest bone biopsies with 2D histomorphometry and 3D microCT (obtained at study onset and conclusion), DXA-BMD at spine/hip/wrist/os calcis (obtained yearly), and markers of bone turnover (obtained at 2-week to 12-month intervals) were analyzed, with an analysis of covariance model used to assess treatment effect for parameters of interest. RESULTS AND
CONCLUSIONS: MRI assessment of trabecular microarchitecture at individual regions of the distal radius revealed significant improvement, or preservation (no significant loss), in the CT-NS-treated group compared with significant deterioration in the placebo control group, as reflected in apparent BV/TV (p < 0.03), apparent trabecular number (p < 0.01), and apparent trabecular spacing (p < 0.01). Also, at the hip, the CT-NS group exhibited preservation of trabecular microarchitecture at the lower trochanter (p < 0.05) as determined by T2* MRI technology. Significant deterioration of trabecular bone architecture was noted in the placebo group at the femoral neck, Ward's triangle, and lower trochanteric sites. Apart from a significant increase in apparent trabecular number in the CT-NS group, significant changes within or between groups were not noted at the os calcis. Combined microCT/histomorphometric analysis of iliac crest bone biopsies did not reveal significant differences between treated and placebo groups. In the CT-NS group, regardless of the change in BMD (gain or loss) at the spine, hip, or distal radius, preservation of parameters of trabecular microarchitecture was noted, whereas in the placebo group, regardless of the change in BMD (gain or loss) at the spine, hip, or distal radius, loss or preservation was noted; however, changes in DXA/BMD (of the spine, hip, wrist, os calcis) between CT-NS and placebo groups were not significant. Serum C-telopeptide (S-CTx), a specific bone resorption marker, was reduced by 22.5% at 24 months (p = 0.056). The results of the QUEST study suggest therapeutic benefit of CT-NS compared with placebo in maintaining trabecular microarchitecture at multiple skeletal sites and support the use of MRI technology for assessment of trabecular microarchitecture in clinical research trials. However, the results also highlight site specific differences in response to antiresorptive therapies and the importance of sufficiently large sampling volumes (areas) to obtain reliable assessment of bone architecture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16059627      PMCID: PMC4445726          DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.050411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  41 in total

1.  Bone turnover matters: the raloxifene treatment paradox of dramatic decreases in vertebral fractures without commensurate increases in bone density.

Authors:  B Lawrence Riggs; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  A randomized trial of nasal spray salmon calcitonin in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis: the prevent recurrence of osteoporotic fractures study. PROOF Study Group.

Authors:  C H Chesnut; S Silverman; K Andriano; H Genant; A Gimona; S Harris; D Kiel; M LeBoff; M Maricic; P Miller; C Moniz; M Peacock; P Richardson; N Watts; D Baylink
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties.

Authors:  S Majumdar; M Kothari; P Augat; D C Newitt; T M Link; J C Lin; T Lang; Y Lu; H K Genant
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Trabecular bone microarchitecture, bone mineral density, and vertebral fractures in male osteoporosis.

Authors:  E Legrand; D Chappard; C Pascaretti; M Duquenne; S Krebs; V Rohmer; M F Basle; M Audran
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee.

Authors:  A M Parfitt; M K Drezner; F H Glorieux; J A Kanis; H Malluche; P J Meunier; S M Ott; R R Recker
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  An evaluation of the quantitative parameters applied in bone histology.

Authors:  F Melsen; B Melsen; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand A       Date:  1978-01

7.  Relationships between bone mineral density and incident vertebral fracture risk with raloxifene therapy.

Authors:  Somnath Sarkar; Bruce H Mitlak; Mayme Wong; John L Stock; Dennis M Black; Kristine D Harper
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators.

Authors:  B Ettinger; D M Black; B H Mitlak; R K Knickerbocker; T Nickelsen; H K Genant; C Christiansen; P D Delmas; J R Zanchetta; J Stakkestad; C C Glüer; K Krueger; F J Cohen; S Eckert; K E Ensrud; L V Avioli; P Lips; S R Cummings
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-08-18       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Phased array detectors and an automated intensity-correction algorithm for high-resolution MR imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  L L Wald; L Carvajal; S E Moyher; S J Nelson; P E Grant; A J Barkovich; D B Vigneron
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Acute effects of calcitonin nasal spray on serum C-telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx) levels in elderly osteopenic women with increased bone turnover.

Authors:  Apurva K Srivastava; Cesar Libanati; Omar Hohmann; Audrey Kriegman; David J Baylink
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 4.333

View more
  52 in total

1.  Efficacy and harms of nasal calcitonin in improving bone density in young patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Helen M Pappa; Tracee M Saslowsky; Rajna Filip-Dhima; Diane DiFabio; Hajar Hassani Lahsinoui; Apurva Akkad; Richard J Grand; Catherine M Gordon
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Trabecular structure analysis using C-arm CT: comparison with MDCT and flat-panel volume CT.

Authors:  Catherine M Phan; Eric A Macklin; Miriam A Bredella; Monica Dadrich; Paul Flechsig; Albert J Yoo; Joshua A Hirsch; Rajiv Gupta
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 3.  Noninvasive assessment of bone microarchitecture by MRI.

Authors:  Glenn A Ladinsky; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.096

Review 4.  Magnetic resonance imaging for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Resolution dependence of the non-metric trabecular structure indices.

Authors:  Miki Sode; Andrew J Burghardt; Robert A Nissenson; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-12-23       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  In vivo magnetic resonance detects rapid remodeling changes in the topology of the trabecular bone network after menopause and the protective effect of estradiol.

Authors:  Felix W Wehrli; Glenn A Ladinsky; Catherine Jones; Maria Benito; Jeremy Magland; Branimir Vasilic; Andra M Popescu; Babette Zemel; Andrew J Cucchiara; Alexander C Wright; Hee K Song; Punam K Saha; Helen Peachey; Peter J Snyder
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 8.  Salmon calcitonin: a review of current and future therapeutic indications.

Authors:  C H Chesnut; M Azria; S Silverman; M Engelhardt; M Olson; L Mindeholm
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Implications of resolution and noise for in vivo micro-MRI of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Charles Q Li; Jeremy F Magland; Chamith S Rajapakse; X Edward Guo; X Henry Zhang; Branimir Vasilic; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Registration-based autofocusing technique for automatic correction of motion artifacts in time-series studies of high-resolution bone MRI.

Authors:  Ning Zhang; Jeremy F Magland; Hee Kwon Song; Felix W Wehrli
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.