PURPOSE: Treatment with aromatase inhibitor (AI) is recommended for post-menopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. However, AI therapy is known to induce bone loss leading to osteoporosis with an increased risk for fragility fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether changes of magnetic resonance (MR)-based trabecular bone microstructure parameters as advanced imaging biomarker can already be detected in subjects with AI intake but still without evidence for osteoporosis according to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based bone mineral density (BMD) measurements as current clinical gold standard. METHODS: Twenty-one postmenopausal women (62±6 years of age) with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, ongoing treatment with aromatase inhibitor for 23±15 months, and no evidence for osteoporosis (current DXA T-score greater than -2.5) were recruited for this study. Eight young, healthy women (24±2 years of age) were included as controls. All subjects underwent 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the distal radius to assess the trabecular bone microstructure. RESULTS: Trabecular bone microstructure parameters were not significantly (p>0.05) different between subjects with AI intake and controls, including apparent bone fraction (0.42±0.03 vs. 0.42±0.05), trabecular number (1.95±0.10 mm(-1) vs 1.89±0.15 mm(-1)), trabecular separation (0.30±0.03 mm vs 0.31±0.06 mm), trabecular thickness (0.21±0.01 mm vs 0.22±0.02 mm), and fractal dimension (1.70±0.02 vs. 1.70±0.03). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the initial deterioration of trabecular bone microstructure as measured by MRI and BMD loss as measured by DXA occur not sequentially but rather simultaneously. Thus, the use of MR-based trabecular bone microstructure assessment is limited as early diagnostic biomarker in this clinical setting.
PURPOSE: Treatment with aromatase inhibitor (AI) is recommended for post-menopausal women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer. However, AI therapy is known to induce bone loss leading to osteoporosis with an increased risk for fragility fractures. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether changes of magnetic resonance (MR)-based trabecular bone microstructure parameters as advanced imaging biomarker can already be detected in subjects with AI intake but still without evidence for osteoporosis according to dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-based bone mineral density (BMD) measurements as current clinical gold standard. METHODS: Twenty-one postmenopausal women (62±6 years of age) with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer, ongoing treatment with aromatase inhibitor for 23±15 months, and no evidence for osteoporosis (current DXA T-score greater than -2.5) were recruited for this study. Eight young, healthy women (24±2 years of age) were included as controls. All subjects underwent 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the distal radius to assess the trabecular bone microstructure. RESULTS: Trabecular bone microstructure parameters were not significantly (p>0.05) different between subjects with AI intake and controls, including apparent bone fraction (0.42±0.03 vs. 0.42±0.05), trabecular number (1.95±0.10 mm(-1) vs 1.89±0.15 mm(-1)), trabecular separation (0.30±0.03 mm vs 0.31±0.06 mm), trabecular thickness (0.21±0.01 mm vs 0.22±0.02 mm), and fractal dimension (1.70±0.02 vs. 1.70±0.03). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the initial deterioration of trabecular bone microstructure as measured by MRI and BMD loss as measured by DXA occur not sequentially but rather simultaneously. Thus, the use of MR-based trabecular bone microstructure assessment is limited as early diagnostic biomarker in this clinical setting.
Entities:
Keywords:
aromatase inhibitor; magnetic resonance imaging; osteoporosis; trabecular bone microstructure
Authors: Harold J Burstein; Ann Alexis Prestrud; Jerome Seidenfeld; Holly Anderson; Thomas A Buchholz; Nancy E Davidson; Karen E Gelmon; Sharon H Giordano; Clifford A Hudis; Jennifer Malin; Eleftherios P Mamounas; Diana Rowden; Alexander J Solky; Maryfran R Sowers; Vered Stearns; Eric P Winer; Mark R Somerfield; Jennifer J Griggs Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Thomas Baum; Melanie Kutscher; Dirk Müller; Christoph Räth; Felix Eckstein; Eva-Maria Lochmüller; Ernst J Rummeny; Thomas M Link; Jan S Bauer Journal: J Bone Miner Metab Date: 2012-11-22 Impact factor: 2.626
Authors: A M Parfitt; M K Drezner; F H Glorieux; J A Kanis; H Malluche; P J Meunier; S M Ott; R R Recker Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 1987-12 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Yan Chevalier; Evelyn Quek; Babul Borah; Gary Gross; John Stewart; Thomas Lang; Philippe Zysset Journal: Bone Date: 2009-10-01 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Christian Graeff; Wolfram Timm; Thomas N Nickelsen; Jordi Farrerons; Fernando Marín; Clare Barker; Claus C Glüer Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 6.741