Literature DB >> 23173848

Evaluating the predictive value of biomarkers with stratified case-cohort design.

Dandan Liu1, Tianxi Cai, Yingye Zheng.   

Abstract

Identification of novel biomarkers for risk assessment is important for both effective disease prevention and optimal treatment recommendation. Discovery relies on the precious yet limited resource of stored biological samples from large prospective cohort studies. Case-cohort sampling design provides a cost-effective tool in the context of biomarker evaluation, especially when the clinical condition of interest is rare. Existing statistical methods focus on making efficient inference on relative hazard parameters from the Cox regression model. Drawing on recent theoretical development on the weighted likelihood for semiparametric models under two-phase studies (Breslow and Wellner, 2007), we propose statistical methods to evaluate accuracy and predictiveness of a risk prediction biomarker, with censored time-to-event outcome under stratified case-cohort sampling. We consider nonparametric methods and a semiparametric method. We derive large sample properties of proposed estimators and evaluate their finite sample performance using numerical studies. We illustrate new procedures using data from Framingham Offspring Study to evaluate the accuracy of a recently developed risk score incorporating biomarker information for predicting cardiovascular disease.
© 2012, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23173848      PMCID: PMC3718317          DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01787.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  17 in total

1.  Exposure stratified case-cohort designs.

Authors:  O Borgan; B Langholz; S O Samuelsen; L Goldstein; J Pogoda
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Joann Manson; Robert Wallace; Bernedine Lund; Dallas Hall; Scott Davis; Sally Shumaker; Ching-Yun Wang; Evan Stein; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

3.  Quantifying and comparing the predictive accuracy of continuous prognostic factors for binary outcomes.

Authors:  Chaya S Moskowitz; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 4.  Cardiovascular risk prediction: basic concepts, current status, and future directions.

Authors:  Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Weighted analyses for cohort sampling designs.

Authors:  Robert J Gray
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  Nonparametric survival estimation using prognostic longitudinal covariates.

Authors:  S Murray; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  An assessment of incremental coronary risk prediction using C-reactive protein and other novel risk markers: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Authors:  Aaron R Folsom; Lloyd E Chambless; Christie M Ballantyne; Josef Coresh; Gerardo Heiss; Kenneth K Wu; Eric Boerwinkle; Thomas H Mosley; Paul Sorlie; Guoqing Diao; A Richey Sharrett
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-10

9.  Improved Horvitz-Thompson Estimation of Model Parameters from Two-phase Stratified Samples: Applications in Epidemiology.

Authors:  Norman E Breslow; Thomas Lumley; Christie M Ballantyne; Lloyd E Chambless; Michal Kulich
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2009-05-01

10.  Time-dependent Predictive Values of Prognostic Biomarkers with Failure Time Outcome.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Margaret S Pepe; Wayne C Levy
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 5.033

View more
  8 in total

1.  Evaluating longitudinal markers under two-phase study designs.

Authors:  Marlena Maziarz; Tianxi Cai; Li Qi; Anna S Lok; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  IMPROVING EFFICIENCY IN BIOMARKER INCREMENTAL VALUE EVALUATION UNDER TWO-PHASE DESIGNS.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Marshall Brown; Anna Lok; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Ann Appl Stat       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 2.083

3.  Evaluating a 4-marker signature of aggressive prostate cancer using time-dependent AUC.

Authors:  Travis A Gerke; Neil E Martin; Zhihu Ding; Elizabeth J Nuttall; Edward C Stack; Edward Giovannucci; Rosina T Lis; Meir J Stampfer; Phillip W Kantoff; Giovanni Parmigiani; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.104

4.  Kernel machine testing for risk prediction with stratified case cohort studies.

Authors:  Rebecca Payne; Matey Neykov; Majken Karoline Jensen; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Study Design Considerations for Cancer Biomarker Discoveries.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng
Journal:  J Appl Lab Med       Date:  2018-09

6.  Robust risk prediction with biomarkers under two-phase stratified cohort design.

Authors:  Rebecca Payne; Ming Yang; Yingye Zheng; Majken K Jensen; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 7.  A Systematic Review of Biomarkers and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes: An Overview of Epidemiological, Prediction and Aetiological Research Literature.

Authors:  Ali Abbasi; Anna-Stina Sahlqvist; Luca Lotta; Julia M Brosnan; Peter Vollenweider; Philippe Giabbanelli; Derek J Nunez; Dawn Waterworth; Robert A Scott; Claudia Langenberg; Nicholas J Wareham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Normalized emphysema scores on low dose CT: Validation as an imaging biomarker for mortality.

Authors:  Leticia Gallardo-Estrella; Esther Pompe; Pim A de Jong; Colin Jacobs; Eva M van Rikxoort; Mathias Prokop; Clara I Sánchez; Bram van Ginneken
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.