Literature DB >> 16832001

An assessment of incremental coronary risk prediction using C-reactive protein and other novel risk markers: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study.

Aaron R Folsom1, Lloyd E Chambless, Christie M Ballantyne, Josef Coresh, Gerardo Heiss, Kenneth K Wu, Eric Boerwinkle, Thomas H Mosley, Paul Sorlie, Guoqing Diao, A Richey Sharrett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There has been interest in recent years in whether additional, and in particular novel, risk factors or blood markers, such as C-reactive protein, can enhance existing coronary heart disease (CHD) prediction models.
METHODS: Using a series of case-cohort studies, the prospective Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study assessed the association of 19 novel risk markers with incident CHD in 15,792 adults followed up since 1987-1989. Novel markers included measures of inflammation, endothelial function, fibrin formation, fibrinolysis, B vitamins, and antibodies to infectious agents. Change in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the additional contribution of novel risk markers to CHD prediction beyond that of traditional risk factors.
RESULTS: The basic risk factor model, which included traditional risk factors (age, race, sex, total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, systolic blood pressure, antihypertensive medication use, smoking status, and diabetes), predicted CHD well, as evidenced by an AUC of approximately 0.8. The C-reactive protein level did not add significantly to the AUC (increase in AUC of 0.003), and neither did most other novel risk factors. Of the 19 markers studied, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A(2), vitamin B(6), interleukin 6, and soluble thrombomodulin added the most to the AUC (range, 0.006-0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that routine measurement of these novel markers is not warranted for risk assessment. On the other hand, our findings reinforce the utility of major, modifiable risk factor assessment to identify individuals at risk for CHD for preventive action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16832001     DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.13.1368

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  101 in total

1.  Prediction of coronary artery calcium progression in individuals with low Framingham Risk Score: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Tochi M Okwuosa; Philip Greenland; Gregory L Burke; John Eng; Mary Cushman; Erin D Michos; Hongyan Ning; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02

2.  Risk prediction measures for case-cohort and nested case-control designs: an application to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Andrea Ganna; Marie Reilly; Ulf de Faire; Nancy Pedersen; Patrik Magnusson; Erik Ingelsson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 3.  Analysis of biomarker data: logs, odds ratios, and receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  Birgit Grund; Caroline Sabin
Journal:  Curr Opin HIV AIDS       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.283

4.  Inflammatory proteins on HDL: what are we measuring?

Authors:  Kevin D O'Brien
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 7.012

5.  Epidemiology and long-term clinical and biologic risk factors for pneumonia in community-dwelling older Americans: analysis of three cohorts.

Authors:  Sachin Yende; Karina Alvarez; Laura Loehr; Aaron R Folsom; Anne B Newman; Lisa A Weissfeld; Richard G Wunderink; Stephen B Kritchevsky; Kenneth J Mukamal; Stephanie J London; Tamara B Harris; Doug C Bauer; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 9.410

6.  Which risk engines are best to assess CVD risk in diabetes?

Authors:  Parinya Chamnan; Rebecca K Simmons; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 43.330

Review 7.  Novel biochemical risk factors for type 2 diabetes: pathogenic insights or prediction possibilities?

Authors:  N Sattar; S G Wannamethee; N G Forouhi
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 8.  Relationship between Interleukin-6 (-174G/C and -572C/G) Promoter Gene Polymorphisms and Risk of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pradeep Kumar; Shubham Misra; Arun Kumar Yadav; Amit Kumar; Mukesh Sriwastva; Kameshwar Prasad
Journal:  Pulse (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-14

9.  Improving global vascular risk prediction with behavioral and anthropometric factors. The multiethnic NOMAS (Northern Manhattan Cohort Study).

Authors:  Ralph L Sacco; Minesh Khatri; Tatjana Rundek; Qiang Xu; Hannah Gardener; Bernadette Boden-Albala; Marco R Di Tullio; Shunichi Homma; Mitchell S V Elkind; Myunghee C Paik
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based method for assessment of cardiovascular disease risk: the NHANES I Follow-up Study cohort.

Authors:  Thomas A Gaziano; Cynthia R Young; Garrett Fitzmaurice; Sidney Atwood; J Michael Gaziano
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.