Literature DB >> 8934589

Nonparametric survival estimation using prognostic longitudinal covariates.

S Murray1, A A Tsiatis.   

Abstract

One of the primary problems facing statisticians who work with survival data is the loss of information that occurs with right-censored data. This research considers trying to recover some of this endpoint information through the use of a prognostic covariate which is measured on each individual. We begin by defining a survival estimate which uses time-dependent covariates to more precisely get at the underlying survival curves in the presence of censoring. This estimate has a smaller asymptotic variance than the usual Kaplan-Meier in the presence of censoring and reduces to the Kaplan-Meier (1958, Journal of the American Statistical Association 53, 457-481) in situations where the covariate is not prognostic or no censoring occurs. In addition, this estimate remains consistent when the incorporated covariate contains information about the censoring process as well as survival information. Because the Kaplan-Meier estimate is known to be biased in this situation due to informative censoring, we recommend use of our estimate.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  19 in total

1.  Using auxiliary time-dependent covariates to recover information in nonparametric testing with censored data.

Authors:  S Murray; A A Tsiatis
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Attributable fraction functions for censored event times.

Authors:  Li Chen; D Y Lin; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.445

3.  Landmark Estimation of Survival and Treatment Effect in a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Layla Parast; Lu Tian; Tianxi Cai
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Limitation of inverse probability-of-censoring weights in estimating survival in the presence of strong selection bias.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Joan S Chmiel; Alvaro Muñoz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Selection Bias Due to Loss to Follow Up in Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Stephen R Cole; Bryan Lau; Sonia Napravnik; Joseph J Eron
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.822

6.  A model-informed rank test for right-censored data with intermediate states.

Authors:  Ritesh Ramchandani; Dianne M Finkelstein; David A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Sequential tests for non-proportional hazards data.

Authors:  Matthias Brückner; Werner Brannath
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 1.588

8.  Estimation of exposure distribution adjusting for association between exposure level and detection limit.

Authors:  Yuchen Yang; Brent J Shelton; Thomas T Tucker; Li Li; Richard Kryscio; Li Chen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Are all biases missing data problems?

Authors:  Chanelle J Howe; Lauren E Cain; Joseph W Hogan
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2015-07-12

10.  Censoring in clinical trials: review of survival analysis techniques.

Authors:  Shankar Prinja; Nidhi Gupta; Ramesh Verma
Journal:  Indian J Community Med       Date:  2010-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.