Literature DB >> 26469352

Evaluating a 4-marker signature of aggressive prostate cancer using time-dependent AUC.

Travis A Gerke1,2, Neil E Martin3, Zhihu Ding4, Elizabeth J Nuttall5, Edward C Stack6, Edward Giovannucci6,7, Rosina T Lis5, Meir J Stampfer1,6,7, Phillip W Kantoff8, Giovanni Parmigiani9, Massimo Loda5, Lorelei A Mucci1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously identified a protein tumor signature of PTEN, SMAD4, SPP1, and CCND1 that, together with clinical features, was associated with lethal outcomes among prostate cancer patients. In the current study, we sought to validate the molecular model using time-dependent measures of AUC and predictive values for discriminating lethal from non-lethal prostate cancer.
METHODS: Using data from the initial study, we fit survival models for men with prostate cancer who were participants in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS; n = 276). Based on these models, we generated prognostic risk scores in an independent population, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; n = 347) to evaluate external validity. In each cohort, men were followed prospectively from cancer diagnosis through 2011 for development of distant metastasis or cancer mortality. We measured protein tumor expression of PTEN, SMAD4, SPP1, and CCND1 on tissue microarrays.
RESULTS: During a median of 11.9 and 14.3 years follow-up in the PHS and HPFS cohorts, 24 and 32 men (9%) developed lethal disease. When used as a prognostic factor in a new population, addition of the four markers to clinical variables did not improve discriminatory accuracy through 15 years of follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the four markers have been identified as key biological mediators in metastatic progression, they do not provide independent, long-term prognostic information beyond clinical factors when measured at diagnosis. This finding may underscore the broad heterogeneity in aggressive prostate tumors and highlight the challenges that may result from overfitting in discovery-based research.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker validation; prognostic biomarkers; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26469352      PMCID: PMC4831584          DOI: 10.1002/pros.23090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  20 in total

1.  Partial AUC estimation and regression.

Authors:  Lori E Dodd; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Molecular sampling of prostate cancer: a dilemma for predicting disease progression.

Authors:  Andrea Sboner; Francesca Demichelis; Stefano Calza; Yudi Pawitan; Sunita R Setlur; Yujin Hoshida; Sven Perner; Hans-Olov Adami; Katja Fall; Lorelei A Mucci; Philip W Kantoff; Meir Stampfer; Swen-Olof Andersson; Eberhard Varenhorst; Jan-Erik Johansson; Mark B Gerstein; Todd R Golub; Mark A Rubin; Ove Andrén
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.063

3.  SMAD4-dependent barrier constrains prostate cancer growth and metastatic progression.

Authors:  Zhihu Ding; Chang-Jiun Wu; Gerald C Chu; Yonghong Xiao; Dennis Ho; Jingfang Zhang; Samuel R Perry; Emma S Labrot; Xiaoqiu Wu; Rosina Lis; Yujin Hoshida; David Hiller; Baoli Hu; Shan Jiang; Hongwu Zheng; Alexander H Stegh; Kenneth L Scott; Sabina Signoretti; Nabeel Bardeesy; Y Alan Wang; David E Hill; Todd R Golub; Meir J Stampfer; Wing H Wong; Massimo Loda; Lorelei Mucci; Lynda Chin; Ronald A DePinho
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Analysis of repeated markers used to predict progression of cancer.

Authors:  B Emir; S Wieand; J Q Su; S Cha
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1998-11-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Prospective study of alcohol consumption and risk of coronary disease in men.

Authors:  E B Rimm; E L Giovannucci; W C Willett; G A Colditz; A Ascherio; B Rosner; M J Stampfer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Design of Physicians' Health Study II--a randomized trial of beta-carotene, vitamins E and C, and multivitamins, in prevention of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and eye disease, and review of results of completed trials.

Authors:  W G Christen; J M Gaziano; C H Hennekens
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.797

8.  Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Nine-gene molecular signature is not associated with prostate cancer death in a watchful waiting cohort.

Authors:  Lorelei A Mucci; Yudi Pawitan; Francesca Demichelis; Katja Fall; Jennifer R Stark; Hans-Olov Adami; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén; Anna S Eisenstein; Lars Holmberg; Wei Huang; Philip W Kantoff; Sven Perner; Meir J Stampfer; Jan-Erik Johansson; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  External validation of a Cox prognostic model: principles and methods.

Authors:  Patrick Royston; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  4 in total

1.  Differential Expression and Prognostic Value of Cytoplasmic and Nuclear Cyclin D1 in Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Zhi Cao; Xi Chen; Yalong Xu; Fei Guo; Jin Ji; Huan Xu; Jingyi He; Yinghao Sun; Fubo Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Trends in Gene Expression Profiling for Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Zhaoyi Chen; Travis Gerke; Victoria Bird; Mattia Prosperi
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2017-05-17

3.  Intra-epithelial non-canonical Activin A signaling safeguards prostate progenitor quiescence.

Authors:  Francesco Cambuli; Veronica Foletto; Alessandro Alaimo; Dario De Felice; Francesco Gandolfi; Maria Dilia Palumbieri; Michela Zaffagni; Sacha Genovesi; Marco Lorenzoni; Martina Celotti; Emiliana Bertossio; Giosuè Mazzero; Arianna Bertossi; Alessandra Bisio; Francesco Berardinelli; Antonio Antoccia; Marco Gaspari; Mattia Barbareschi; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Michael M Shen; Massimo Loda; Alessandro Romanel; Andrea Lunardi
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2022-03-07       Impact factor: 9.071

4.  Corpora amylacea in prostatectomy tissue and associations with molecular, histological, and lifestyle factors.

Authors:  Natalie C DuPre; Richard Flavin; Karen S Sfanos; Robert H Unger; Samantha To; Elizaveta Gazeeva; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Angelo M De Marzo; Jennifer R Rider; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 4.012

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.