Travis A Gerke1,2, Neil E Martin3, Zhihu Ding4, Elizabeth J Nuttall5, Edward C Stack6, Edward Giovannucci6,7, Rosina T Lis5, Meir J Stampfer1,6,7, Phillip W Kantoff8, Giovanni Parmigiani9, Massimo Loda5, Lorelei A Mucci1. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Department of Epidemiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 4. Belfer Center for Applied Cancer Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 5. Center for Molecular Oncologic Pathology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 6. Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. 7. Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. 8. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 9. Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We previously identified a protein tumor signature of PTEN, SMAD4, SPP1, and CCND1 that, together with clinical features, was associated with lethal outcomes among prostate cancer patients. In the current study, we sought to validate the molecular model using time-dependent measures of AUC and predictive values for discriminating lethal from non-lethal prostate cancer. METHODS: Using data from the initial study, we fit survival models for men with prostate cancer who were participants in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS; n = 276). Based on these models, we generated prognostic risk scores in an independent population, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; n = 347) to evaluate external validity. In each cohort, men were followed prospectively from cancer diagnosis through 2011 for development of distant metastasis or cancer mortality. We measured protein tumor expression of PTEN, SMAD4, SPP1, and CCND1 on tissue microarrays. RESULTS: During a median of 11.9 and 14.3 years follow-up in the PHS and HPFS cohorts, 24 and 32 men (9%) developed lethal disease. When used as a prognostic factor in a new population, addition of the four markers to clinical variables did not improve discriminatory accuracy through 15 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although the four markers have been identified as key biological mediators in metastatic progression, they do not provide independent, long-term prognostic information beyond clinical factors when measured at diagnosis. This finding may underscore the broad heterogeneity in aggressive prostate tumors and highlight the challenges that may result from overfitting in discovery-based research.
BACKGROUND: We previously identified a protein tumor signature of PTEN, SMAD4, SPP1, and CCND1 that, together with clinical features, was associated with lethal outcomes among prostate cancerpatients. In the current study, we sought to validate the molecular model using time-dependent measures of AUC and predictive values for discriminating lethal from non-lethal prostate cancer. METHODS: Using data from the initial study, we fit survival models for men with prostate cancer who were participants in the Physicians' Health Study (PHS; n = 276). Based on these models, we generated prognostic risk scores in an independent population, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS; n = 347) to evaluate external validity. In each cohort, men were followed prospectively from cancer diagnosis through 2011 for development of distant metastasis or cancer mortality. We measured protein tumor expression of PTEN, SMAD4, SPP1, and CCND1 on tissue microarrays. RESULTS: During a median of 11.9 and 14.3 years follow-up in the PHS and HPFS cohorts, 24 and 32 men (9%) developed lethal disease. When used as a prognostic factor in a new population, addition of the four markers to clinical variables did not improve discriminatory accuracy through 15 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although the four markers have been identified as key biological mediators in metastatic progression, they do not provide independent, long-term prognostic information beyond clinical factors when measured at diagnosis. This finding may underscore the broad heterogeneity in aggressive prostate tumors and highlight the challenges that may result from overfitting in discovery-based research.
Authors: Andrea Sboner; Francesca Demichelis; Stefano Calza; Yudi Pawitan; Sunita R Setlur; Yujin Hoshida; Sven Perner; Hans-Olov Adami; Katja Fall; Lorelei A Mucci; Philip W Kantoff; Meir Stampfer; Swen-Olof Andersson; Eberhard Varenhorst; Jan-Erik Johansson; Mark B Gerstein; Todd R Golub; Mark A Rubin; Ove Andrén Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Zhihu Ding; Chang-Jiun Wu; Gerald C Chu; Yonghong Xiao; Dennis Ho; Jingfang Zhang; Samuel R Perry; Emma S Labrot; Xiaoqiu Wu; Rosina Lis; Yujin Hoshida; David Hiller; Baoli Hu; Shan Jiang; Hongwu Zheng; Alexander H Stegh; Kenneth L Scott; Sabina Signoretti; Nabeel Bardeesy; Y Alan Wang; David E Hill; Todd R Golub; Meir J Stampfer; Wing H Wong; Massimo Loda; Lorelei Mucci; Lynda Chin; Ronald A DePinho Journal: Nature Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-07-19 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: E B Rimm; E L Giovannucci; W C Willett; G A Colditz; A Ascherio; B Rosner; M J Stampfer Journal: Lancet Date: 1991-08-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Anna Bill-Axelson; Lars Holmberg; Hans Garmo; Jennifer R Rider; Kimmo Taari; Christer Busch; Stig Nordling; Michael Häggman; Swen-Olof Andersson; Anders Spångberg; Ove Andrén; Juni Palmgren; Gunnar Steineck; Hans-Olov Adami; Jan-Erik Johansson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-06 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lorelei A Mucci; Yudi Pawitan; Francesca Demichelis; Katja Fall; Jennifer R Stark; Hans-Olov Adami; Swen-Olof Andersson; Ove Andrén; Anna S Eisenstein; Lars Holmberg; Wei Huang; Philip W Kantoff; Sven Perner; Meir J Stampfer; Jan-Erik Johansson; Mark A Rubin Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Francesco Cambuli; Veronica Foletto; Alessandro Alaimo; Dario De Felice; Francesco Gandolfi; Maria Dilia Palumbieri; Michela Zaffagni; Sacha Genovesi; Marco Lorenzoni; Martina Celotti; Emiliana Bertossio; Giosuè Mazzero; Arianna Bertossi; Alessandra Bisio; Francesco Berardinelli; Antonio Antoccia; Marco Gaspari; Mattia Barbareschi; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Michael M Shen; Massimo Loda; Alessandro Romanel; Andrea Lunardi Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2022-03-07 Impact factor: 9.071
Authors: Natalie C DuPre; Richard Flavin; Karen S Sfanos; Robert H Unger; Samantha To; Elizaveta Gazeeva; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Angelo M De Marzo; Jennifer R Rider; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: Prostate Date: 2018-07-15 Impact factor: 4.012