Literature DB >> 27037494

Robust risk prediction with biomarkers under two-phase stratified cohort design.

Rebecca Payne1, Ming Yang1, Yingye Zheng2, Majken K Jensen3, Tianxi Cai1.   

Abstract

Identification of novel biomarkers for risk prediction is important for disease prevention and optimal treatment selection. However, studies aiming to discover which biomarkers are useful for risk prediction often require the use of stored biological samples from large assembled cohorts, and thus the depletion of a finite and precious resource. To make efficient use of such stored samples, two-phase sampling designs are often adopted as resource-efficient sampling strategies, especially when the outcome of interest is rare. Existing methods for analyzing data from two-phase studies focus primarily on single marker analysis or fitting the Cox regression model to combine information from multiple markers. However, the Cox model may not fit the data well. Under model misspecification, the composite score derived from the Cox model may not perform well in predicting the outcome. Under a general two-phase stratified cohort sampling design, we present a novel approach to combining multiple markers to optimize prediction by fitting a flexible nonparametric transformation model. Using inverse probability weighting to account for the outcome-dependent sampling, we propose to estimate the model parameters by maximizing an objective function which can be interpreted as a weighted C-statistic for survival outcomes. Regardless of model adequacy, the proposed procedure yields a sensible composite risk score for prediction. A major obstacle for making inference under two phase studies is due to the correlation induced by the finite population sampling, which prevents standard inference procedures such as the bootstrap from being used for variance estimation. We propose a resampling procedure to derive valid confidence intervals for the model parameters and the C-statistic accuracy measure. We illustrate the new methods with simulation studies and an analysis of a two-phase study of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) subtypes for predicting the risk of coronary heart disease.
© 2016, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-statistic; Finite population sampling; Outcome-dependent sampling; Perturbation resampling; Risk prediction; Robustness; Two-phase stratified cohort sampling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27037494      PMCID: PMC5045782          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  27 in total

1.  Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative study design.

Authors:  Garnet L Anderson; Joann Manson; Robert Wallace; Bernedine Lund; Dallas Hall; Scott Davis; Sally Shumaker; Ching-Yun Wang; Evan Stein; Ross L Prentice
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Robust combination of multiple diagnostic tests for classifying censored event times.

Authors:  T Cai; S Cheng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  A comparison of bootstrap methods and an adjusted bootstrap approach for estimating the prediction error in microarray classification.

Authors:  Wenyu Jiang; Richard Simon
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Weighted analyses for cohort sampling designs.

Authors:  Robert J Gray
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 5.  Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; D B Mark
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Prospective study of alcohol consumption and risk of coronary disease in men.

Authors:  E B Rimm; E L Giovannucci; W C Willett; G A Colditz; A Ascherio; B Rosner; M J Stampfer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Study design, exposure variables, and socioeconomic determinants of participation in Diet, Cancer and Health: a population-based prospective cohort study of 57,053 men and women in Denmark.

Authors:  Anne Tjønneland; Anja Olsen; Katja Boll; Connie Stripp; Jane Christensen; Gerda Engholm; Kim Overvad
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.021

8.  Obesity, behavioral lifestyle factors, and risk of acute coronary events.

Authors:  Majken K Jensen; Stephanie E Chiuve; Eric B Rimm; Claus Dethlefsen; Anne Tjønneland; Albert M Joensen; Kim Overvad
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-06-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  A prospective evaluation of insulin and insulin-like growth factor-I as risk factors for endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Marc J Gunter; Donald R Hoover; Herbert Yu; Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller; Joann E Manson; Jixin Li; Tiffany G Harris; Thomas E Rohan; Xiaonan Xue; Gloria Y F Ho; Mark H Einstein; Robert C Kaplan; Robert D Burk; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Michael N Pollak; Garnet Anderson; Barbara V Howard; Howard D Strickler
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Apolipoprotein C-III as a Potential Modulator of the Association Between HDL-Cholesterol and Incident Coronary Heart Disease.

Authors:  Majken K Jensen; Eric B Rimm; Jeremy D Furtado; Frank M Sacks
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.