Literature DB >> 19655041

Time-dependent Predictive Values of Prognostic Biomarkers with Failure Time Outcome.

Yingye Zheng1, Tianxi Cai, Margaret S Pepe, Wayne C Levy.   

Abstract

In a prospective cohort study, information on clinical parameters, tests and molecular markers is often collected. Such information is useful to predict patient prognosis and to select patients for targeted therapy. We propose a new graphical approach, the positive predictive value (PPV) curve, to quantify the predictive accuracy of prognostic markers measured on a continuous scale with censored failure time outcome. The proposed method highlights the need to consider both predictive values and the marker distribution in the population when evaluating a marker, and it provides a common scale for comparing different markers. We consider both semiparametric and nonparametric based estimating procedures. In addition, we provide asymptotic distribution theory and resampling based procedures for making statistical inference. We illustrate our approach with numerical studies and datasets from the Seattle Heart Failure Study.

Entities:  

Year:  2008        PMID: 19655041      PMCID: PMC2719907          DOI: 10.1198/016214507000001481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  10 in total

1.  Assessment and comparison of prognostic classification schemes for survival data.

Authors:  E Graf; C Schmoor; W Sauerbrei; M Schumacher
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1999 Sep 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Predictive accuracy and explained variation in Cox regression.

Authors:  M Schemper; R Henderson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Quantifying and comparing the predictive accuracy of continuous prognostic factors for binary outcomes.

Authors:  Chaya S Moskowitz; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Quantifying and comparing the accuracy of binary biomarkers when predicting a failure time outcome.

Authors:  Chaya S Moskowitz; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2004-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  On criteria for evaluating models of absolute risk.

Authors:  Mitchell H Gail; Ruth M Pfeiffer
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Integrating the predictiveness of a marker with its performance as a classifier.

Authors:  Margaret S Pepe; Ziding Feng; Ying Huang; Gary Longton; Ross Prentice; Ian M Thompson; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2007-11-02       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Comparing tumour staging and grading systems: a case study and a review of the issues, using thymoma as a model.

Authors:  C B Begg; L D Cramer; E S Venkatraman; J Rosai
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2000-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Monitoring and evaluating the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme: evaluating the variation in radiological performance between individual programmes using PPV-referral diagrams.

Authors:  R G Blanks; S M Moss; M G Wallis
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.136

9.  The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure.

Authors:  Wayne C Levy; Dariush Mozaffarian; David T Linker; Santosh C Sutradhar; Stefan D Anker; Anne B Cropp; Inder Anand; Aldo Maggioni; Paul Burton; Mark D Sullivan; Bertram Pitt; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Douglas L Mann; Milton Packer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Predicting mortality among patients hospitalized for heart failure: derivation and validation of a clinical model.

Authors:  Douglas S Lee; Peter C Austin; Jean L Rouleau; Peter P Liu; David Naimark; Jack V Tu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2003-11-19       Impact factor: 56.272

  10 in total
  22 in total

1.  Predictive accuracy of covariates for event times.

Authors:  Li Chen; D Y Lin; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2012-04-29       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Evaluating prognostic accuracy of biomarkers in nested case-control studies.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Robust prediction of t-year survival with data from multiple studies.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Thomas A Gerds; Yingye Zheng; Jinbo Chen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2010-07-28       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Evaluation of heart failure biomarker tests: a survey of statistical considerations.

Authors:  Arkendra De; Kristen Meier; Rong Tang; Meijuan Li; Thomas Gwise; Shanti Gomatam; Gene Pennello
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2013-05-14       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  A threshold-free summary index of prediction accuracy for censored time to event data.

Authors:  Yan Yuan; Qian M Zhou; Bingying Li; Hengrui Cai; Eric J Chow; Gregory T Armstrong
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A direct method to evaluate the time-dependent predictive accuracy for biomarkers.

Authors:  Weining Shen; Jing Ning; Ying Yuan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Evaluating a 4-marker signature of aggressive prostate cancer using time-dependent AUC.

Authors:  Travis A Gerke; Neil E Martin; Zhihu Ding; Elizabeth J Nuttall; Edward C Stack; Edward Giovannucci; Rosina T Lis; Meir J Stampfer; Phillip W Kantoff; Giovanni Parmigiani; Massimo Loda; Lorelei A Mucci
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 4.104

8.  Evaluating incremental values from new predictors with net reclassification improvement in survival analysis.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Layla Parast; Tianxi Cai; Marshall Brown
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  Non-parametric Evaluation of Biomarker Accuracy under Nested Case-control Studies.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Yingye Zheng
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Semiparametric models of time-dependent predictive values of prognostic biomarkers.

Authors:  Yingye Zheng; Tianxi Cai; Janet L Stanford; Ziding Feng
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.