Literature DB >> 23165223

Reconstructing wholes from parts: effects of modality, age, and hearing loss on word recognition.

Vidya Krull1, Larry E Humes, Gary R Kidd.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, the effects of age, hearing loss, and modality on the ability to integrate partial information in degraded stimuli, either speech or text, were examined using isolated words. It was hypothesized that the ability to make use of partial information in speech diminishes with age. It was also hypothesized that additional contributions of cochlear pathology underlying hearing loss would be manifest as a further decrement in performance for older adults with hearing loss, relative to older adults with normal hearing. Furthermore, it was hypothesized that, if the ability to integrate partial information in speech is amodal, then recognition performance for degraded speech would be associated with recognition performance for parallel measures of degraded text. Last, it was hypothesized that, if the nature of the amodal ability to integrate partial information is cognitive, then the performance on auditory and visual measures of word recognition would be correlated with performance on measures of working memory.
DESIGN: Twenty-five young adults with normal hearing, 20 older adults with normal hearing, and 21 older adults with hearing loss participated in this study. All participants completed three auditory and two parallel visual tasks consisting of listening to or reading degraded words or text. Older participants also completed a working-memory test battery. Group effects were examined for each of the auditory and visual measures. Performance of older participants on cognitive measures was compared with available data from a younger group participating in a different study in our laboratory (with similar protocol). Correlations between auditory and visual measures of speech recognition were examined for all participants. In addition, correlations between perceptual and cognitive measures were computed for the older participants. Finally, the relationship between dependent auditory measures and other independent measures in older adults were further examined using stepwise linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: Of the 10 possible comparisons between the young and the two older groups for the five primary dependent measures, the young performed significantly better than the elderly did, 8 of the 10 times. The two older groups performed similarly for most tasks. In young adults, performance among the auditory tasks and between the two visual tasks was significantly and moderately to strongly correlated. In addition, performance on one of the visual tasks was weakly to moderately significantly correlated with performance on each of the three auditory tasks. Similar moderate to strong correlations were found within the auditory and visual modalities in older adults. However, none of the between-modality correlations were significant in the elderly.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the results of this study suggest that the ability to integrate partial information in degraded words diminishes with age. Once audibility is accounted for, this ability does not seem to diminish with cochlear pathology. In young adults, both modality-specific factors and amodal cognitive factors seem to contribute to this ability. In older adults, although modality-specific factors continue to be important, it seems that the perceptual mechanisms that underlie the processing of degraded speech and text are separate, at least for isolated words. Our results suggest that, when peripheral factors are accounted for, some higher-level, yet-to-be identified, age-related factors contribute to speech-communication difficulties in the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23165223      PMCID: PMC3578970          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31826d0c27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  39 in total

1.  Converging evidence that visuospatial cognition is more age-sensitive than verbal cognition.

Authors:  L Jenkins; J Myerson; J A Joerding; S Hale
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2000-03

2.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.

Authors:  M F Folstein; S E Folstein; P R McHugh
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 4.791

Review 3.  Aging, executive control, and attention: a review of meta-analyses.

Authors:  Paul Verhaeghen; John Cerella
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 8.989

4.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability.

Authors:  D N Kalikow; K N Stevens; L L Elliott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Perceptual restoration of missing speech sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-01-23       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Standardization of a test of speech perception in noise.

Authors:  R C Bilger; J M Nuetzel; W M Rabinowitz; C Rzeczkowski
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1984-03

Review 7.  Perceptual restoration of obliterated sounds.

Authors:  R M Warren
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  Tests of the neural noise hypothesis of age-related cognitive change.

Authors:  T A Salthouse; W Lichty
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1985-07

9.  Phonemic restoration: insights from a new methodology.

Authors:  A G Samuel
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1981-12

Review 10.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jennifer J Lister; Anthony T Cacace; Karen J Cruickshanks; George A Gates; Richard H Wilson; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  11 in total

1.  Integration of Partial Information Within and Across Modalities: Contributions to Spoken and Written Sentence Recognition.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Long-term musical experience and auditory and visual perceptual abilities under adverse conditions.

Authors:  Esperanza M Anaya; David B Pisoni; William G Kronenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual Organization of Interrupted Speech and Text.

Authors:  Valeriy Shafiro; Daniel Fogerty; Kimberly Smith; Stanley Sheft
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Age effects on perceptual organization of speech: Contributions of glimpsing, phonemic restoration, and speech segregation.

Authors:  William J Bologna; Kenneth I Vaden; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Integration of partial information for spoken and written sentence recognition by older listeners.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Older adult recognition error patterns when listening to interrupted speech and speech in steady-state noise.

Authors:  Kimberly G Smith; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Larry E Humes
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 9.  How linguistic closure and verbal working memory relate to speech recognition in noise--a review.

Authors:  Jana Besser; Thomas Koelewijn; Adriana A Zekveld; Sophia E Kramer; Joost M Festen
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2013-08-13

10.  Lexical Influences on Spoken Spondaic Word Recognition in Hearing-Impaired Patients.

Authors:  Annie Moulin; Céline Richard
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.