Literature DB >> 22967738

Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Larry E Humes1, Judy R Dubno, Sandra Gordon-Salant, Jennifer J Lister, Anthony T Cacace, Karen J Cruickshanks, George A Gates, Richard H Wilson, Arthur Wingfield.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors reviewed the evidence regarding the existence of age-related declines in central auditory processes and the consequences of any such declines for everyday communication.
PURPOSE: This report summarizes the review process and presents its findings. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The authors reviewed 165 articles germane to central presbycusis. Of the 165 articles, 132 articles with a focus on human behavioral measures for either speech or nonspeech stimuli were selected for further analysis.
RESULTS: For 76 smaller-scale studies of speech understanding in older adults reviewed, the following findings emerged: (1) the three most commonly studied behavioral measures were speech in competition, temporally distorted speech, and binaural speech perception (especially dichotic listening); (2) for speech in competition and temporally degraded speech, hearing loss proved to have a significant negative effect on performance in most of the laboratory studies; (3) significant negative effects of age, unconfounded by hearing loss, were observed in most of the studies of speech in competing speech, time-compressed speech, and binaural speech perception; and (4) the influence of cognitive processing on speech understanding has been examined much less frequently, but when included, significant positive associations with speech understanding were observed. For 36 smaller-scale studies of the perception of nonspeech stimuli by older adults reviewed, the following findings emerged: (1) the three most frequently studied behavioral measures were gap detection, temporal discrimination, and temporal-order discrimination or identification; (2) hearing loss was seldom a significant factor; and (3) negative effects of age were almost always observed. For 18 studies reviewed that made use of test batteries and medium-to-large sample sizes, the following findings emerged: (1) all studies included speech-based measures of auditory processing; (2) 4 of the 18 studies included nonspeech stimuli; (3) for the speech-based measures, monaural speech in a competing-speech background, dichotic speech, and monaural time-compressed speech were investigated most frequently; (4) the most frequently used tests were the Synthetic Sentence Identification (SSI) test with Ipsilateral Competing Message (ICM), the Dichotic Sentence Identification (DSI) test, and time-compressed speech; (5) many of these studies using speech-based measures reported significant effects of age, but most of these studies were confounded by declines in hearing, cognition, or both; (6) for nonspeech auditory-processing measures, the focus was on measures of temporal processing in all four studies; (7) effects of cognition on nonspeech measures of auditory processing have been studied less frequently, with mixed results, whereas the effects of hearing loss on performance were minimal due to judicious selection of stimuli; and (8) there is a paucity of observational studies using test batteries and longitudinal designs.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review of the scientific literature, there is insufficient evidence to confirm the existence of central presbycusis as an isolated entity. On the other hand, recent evidence has been accumulating in support of the existence of central presbycusis as a multifactorial condition that involves age- and/or disease-related changes in the auditory system and in the brain. Moreover, there is a clear need for additional research in this area. American Academy of Audiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22967738      PMCID: PMC5898229          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.23.8.5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  97 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Temporal resolution in young and elderly subjects as measured by mismatch negativity and a psychoacoustic gap detection task.

Authors:  Sibylle Bertoli; Jacek Smurzynski; Rudolf Probst
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Individual differences in auditory abilities.

Authors:  Gary R Kidd; Charles S Watson; Brian Gygi
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Multisensory interactions in primate auditory cortex: fMRI and electrophysiology.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Christopher I Petkov; Nikos K Logothetis
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise.

Authors:  L H Mayo; M Florentine; S Buus
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Emergence of a powerful connection between sensory and cognitive functions across the adult life span: a new window to the study of cognitive aging?

Authors:  P B Baltes; U Lindenberger
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1997-03

7.  Simulated hearing loss and phrase dictation.

Authors:  L L Skenes; J M Schear; V D Larson
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 2.292

8.  Stimulus variability and spoken word recognition. II. The effects of age and hearing impairment.

Authors:  M S Sommers
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effects of age and gender on dichotic sentence identification.

Authors:  J Jerger; R Chmiel; J Allen; A Wilson
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Evaluation of the use of a new compact disc for auditory perceptual assessment in the elderly.

Authors:  L E Humes; M Coughlin; L Talley
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  110 in total

1.  Brain Aging in Midlife: The Beaver Dam Offspring Study.

Authors:  Carla R Schubert; Mary E Fischer; A Alex Pinto; Yanjun Chen; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Michael Y Tsai; Ted S Tweed; Karen J Cruickshanks
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 5.562

2.  Age-related changes in auditory nerve-inner hair cell connections, hair cell numbers, auditory brain stem response and gap detection in UM-HET4 mice.

Authors:  R A Altschuler; D F Dolan; K Halsey; A Kanicki; N Deng; C Martin; J Eberle; D C Kohrman; R A Miller; J Schacht
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Keys to staying sharp: A randomized clinical trial of piano training among older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Hudak; Jennifer Bugos; Ross Andel; Jennifer J Lister; Ming Ji; Jerri D Edwards
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Age-related cochlear synaptopathy: an early-onset contributor to auditory functional decline.

Authors:  Yevgeniya Sergeyenko; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  The effects of aging on auditory cortical function.

Authors:  Gregg Recanzone
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Restoration of sensory input may improve cognitive and neural function.

Authors:  Hanin Karawani; Kimberly Jenkins; Samira Anderson
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  How aging impacts the encoding of binaural cues and the perception of auditory space.

Authors:  Ann Clock Eddins; Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Auditory Training: Evidence for Neural Plasticity in Older Adults.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Nina Kraus
Journal:  Perspect Hear Hear Disord Res Res Diagn       Date:  2013-05

10.  Dichotic Digits Test Performance Across the Ages: Results From Two Large Epidemiologic Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Mary E Fischer; Karen J Cruickshanks; David M Nondahl; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; James S Pankow; Ted S Tweed; Dayna S Dalton; Adam J Paulsen
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.