Literature DB >> 26458131

Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.

Vidya Krull1, Larry E Humes.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this experiment was to quantify the contribution of visual text to auditory speech recognition in background noise. Specifically, the authors tested the hypothesis that partially accurate visual text from an automatic speech recognizer could be used successfully to supplement speech understanding in difficult listening conditions in older adults, with normal or impaired hearing. The working hypotheses were based on what is known regarding audiovisual speech perception in the elderly from speechreading literature. We hypothesized that (1) combining auditory and visual text information will result in improved recognition accuracy compared with auditory or visual text information alone, (2) benefit from supplementing speech with visual text (auditory and visual enhancement) in young adults will be greater than that in older adults, and (3) individual differences in performance on perceptual measures would be associated with cognitive abilities.
DESIGN: Fifteen young adults with normal hearing, 15 older adults with normal hearing, and 15 older adults with hearing loss participated in this study. All participants completed sentence recognition tasks in auditory-only, text-only, and combined auditory-text conditions. The auditory sentence stimuli were spectrally shaped to restore audibility for the older participants with impaired hearing. All participants also completed various cognitive measures, including measures of working memory, processing speed, verbal comprehension, perceptual and cognitive speed, processing efficiency, inhibition, and the ability to form wholes from parts. Group effects were examined for each of the perceptual and cognitive measures. Audiovisual benefit was calculated relative to performance on auditory- and visual-text only conditions. Finally, the relationship between perceptual measures and other independent measures were examined using principal-component factor analyses, followed by regression analyses.
RESULTS: Both young and older adults performed similarly on 9 out of 10 perceptual measures (auditory, visual, and combined measures). Combining degraded speech with partially correct text from an automatic speech recognizer improved the understanding of speech in both young and older adults, relative to both auditory- and text-only performance. In all subjects, cognition emerged as a key predictor for a general speech-text integration ability.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that neither age nor hearing loss affected the ability of subjects to benefit from text when used to support speech, after ensuring audibility through spectral shaping. These results also suggest that the benefit obtained by supplementing auditory input with partially accurate text is modulated by cognitive ability, specifically lexical and verbal skills.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26458131      PMCID: PMC4767644          DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  39 in total

1.  Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  AQT cognitive speed and processing efficiency differentiate adults with and without ADHD: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Niels Peter Nielsen; Elisabeth Hemmersam Wiig
Journal:  Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 1.812

3.  Statistical facilitation of simple reaction times.

Authors:  D H RAAB
Journal:  Trans N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1962-03

4.  Aging, audiovisual integration, and the principle of inverse effectiveness.

Authors:  Nancy Tye-Murray; Mitchell Sommers; Brent Spehar; Joel Myerson; Sandra Hale
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Crossmodal integration in the identification of consonant segments.

Authors:  L D Braida
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-08

6.  Auditory and visual speech perception: confirmation of a modality-independent source of individual differences in speech recognition.

Authors:  C S Watson; W W Qiu; M M Chamberlain; X Li
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory-visual speech perception and aging.

Authors:  Kathleen M Cienkowski; Arlene Earley Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Yuri Agrawal; Elizabeth A Platz; John K Niparko
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2008-07-28

9.  The benefits of hearing aids and closed captioning for television viewing by older adults with hearing loss.

Authors:  Sandra Gordon-Salant; Julia S Callahan
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 10.  Central presbycusis: a review and evaluation of the evidence.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Judy R Dubno; Sandra Gordon-Salant; Jennifer J Lister; Anthony T Cacace; Karen J Cruickshanks; George A Gates; Richard H Wilson; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.664

View more
  3 in total

1.  Combining partial information from speech and text.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Irraj Iftikhar; Rachel Madorskiy
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Jenna Terpening; Angela C Costanzi; Karen S Helfer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A Scoping Review of Audiovisual Integration Methodology: Screening for Auditory and Visual Impairment in Younger and Older Adults.

Authors:  Aysha Basharat; Archana Thayanithy; Michael Barnett-Cowan
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 5.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.