Literature DB >> 23164379

Multiparametric ultrasound of the prostate: adding contrast enhanced ultrasound to real-time elastography to detect histopathologically confirmed cancer.

Marko Brock1, Thilo Eggert, Rein Jüri Palisaar, Florian Roghmann, Katharina Braun, Björn Löppenberg, Florian Sommerer, Joachim Noldus, Christian von Bodman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We prospectively assessed whether a combined approach of real-time elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound would improve prostate cancer visualization.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between June 2011 and January 2012, 100 patients with biopsy proven prostate cancer underwent preoperative transrectal multiparametric ultrasound combining real-time elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound. After initial elastographic screening for suspicious lesions, defined as blue areas with decreased tissue strain, each lesion was allocated to the corresponding prostate sector. The target lesion was defined as the largest cancer suspicious area. Perfusion was monitored after intravenous injection of contrast agent. Target lesions were examined for hypoperfusion, normoperfusion or hyperperfusion. Imaging results were correlated with final pathological evaluation on whole mount slides after radical prostatectomy.
RESULTS: Of 100 patients 86 were eligible for final analysis. Real-time elastography detected prostate cancer with 49% sensitivity and 73.6% specificity. Histopathology confirmed malignancy in 56 of the 86 target lesions (65.1%). Of these 56 lesions 52 (92.9%) showed suspicious perfusion, including hypoperfusion in 48.2% and hyperperfusion in 48.2%, while only 4 (7.1%) showed normal perfusion patterns (p = 0.001). The multiparametric approach decreased the false-positive value of real-time elastography alone from 34.9% to 10.3% and improved the positive predictive value of cancer detection from 65.1% to 89.7%.
CONCLUSIONS: Perfusion patterns of prostate cancer suspicious elastographic lesions are heterogeneous. However, the combined approach of real-time elastography and contrast enhanced ultrasound in this pilot study significantly decreased false-positive results and improved the positive predictive value of correctly identifying histopathological cancer.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23164379     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  On the Relationship between Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Parameters and the Underlying Vascular Architecture Extracted from Acoustic Angiography.

Authors:  Anastasiia Panfilova; Sarah E Shelton; Cristina Caresio; Ruud J G van Sloun; Filippo Molinari; Hessel Wijkstra; Paul A Dayton; Massimo Mischi
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 2.  Image-guided robotic interventions for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ashwin N Sridhar; Archie Hughes-Hallett; Erik K Mayer; Philip J Pratt; Philip J Edwards; Guang-Zhong Yang; Ara W Darzi; Justin A Vale
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-06-18       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Real-time elastography for the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Georg Salomon; Jonas Schiffmann
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Transrectal real-time elastography-guided transperineal prostate biopsy as an improved tool for prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Ren Wang; Jin-Jin Chen; Bing Hu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-04-15

5.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with dispersion analysis for the localization of prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Arnoud W Postema; Maudy C W Gayet; Ruud J G van Sloun; Rogier R Wildeboer; Christophe K Mannaerts; C Dilara Savci-Heijink; Stefan G Schalk; Amir Kajtazovic; Henk van der Poel; Peter F A Mulders; Harrie P Beerlage; Massimo Mischi; Hessel Wijkstra
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Prostate cancer detection and diagnosis: the role of MR and its comparison with other diagnostic modalities--a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Tobias Penzkofer; Clare M Tempany-Afdhal
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 7.  Innovations in diagnostic imaging of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Karl Pummer; Malte Rieken; Herbert Augustin; Thomas Gutschi; Shahrokh F Shariat
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Thermoacoustic contrast of prostate cancer due to heating by very high frequency irradiation.

Authors:  S K Patch; D Hull; M Thomas; S K Griep; K Jacobsohn; W A See
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 9.  [Ultrasonography of the prostate gland : From B‑image through multiparametric ultrasound to targeted biopsy].

Authors:  F Steinkohl; A Luger; J Bektic; F Aigner
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Comparison of meta-analyses among elastosonography (ES) and positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging techniques in the application of prostate cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Qiaohong Ouyang; Zhongxiang Duan; Jixiao Lei; Guangli Jiao
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-09-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.